Actually it would because their whole thing is that a brown woman is undeserving of that respect. She needs to be a Proper Minority Woman - pumping out babies (but not too many, as to not out-reproduce white 'Muricans) and being exploited by corporations while supporting her White Alpha Male cuck husband.
Politicians are called by their more interesting name, but hundreds of years of male rule have rendered all male given names boring and all female given names exciting
Personally, I’m inclined to use Kamala Harris’ first name just because it’s fun to say. It has a rhythm and repetition to it. Also, we’ve already had a President Harrison, so it distinguishes her.
With Hillary Rodham Clinton, I usually used her first name, initials, or full name to distinguish her from her husband. As much as I loath that she was always in his shadow, she was a force to be reckoned with. They may be a power couple, but she deserves her own recognition.
As for Tim Walz, Tim is just too common and uninteresting. Walz has character and it’s close to waltz.
Sidenote: I hate when people refer to women by their first names and men by their lasts. Would it be so difficult to call it the Harris campaign?
They think Kamala sounds foreign enough to make the racists mad.
See also “Barack HUSSEIN Obama.” Which Trump uses regularly on his dumb website.
Actually it would because their whole thing is that a brown woman is undeserving of that respect. She needs to be a Proper Minority Woman - pumping out babies (but not too many, as to not out-reproduce white 'Muricans) and being exploited by corporations while supporting her White Alpha Male
cuckhusband.If that’s why people refer to politicians by first name, why does everyone say Bernie instead of Sanders? Or Teddy instead of Roosevelt?
I think the rule is that you get first name treatment if you’re further left than a neoliberal, or if you have a more famous relative.
I think it’s about if your first name is cooler than your last.
Politicians are called by their more interesting name, but hundreds of years of male rule have rendered all male given names boring and all female given names exciting
Personally, I’m inclined to use Kamala Harris’ first name just because it’s fun to say. It has a rhythm and repetition to it. Also, we’ve already had a President Harrison, so it distinguishes her.
With Hillary Rodham Clinton, I usually used her first name, initials, or full name to distinguish her from her husband. As much as I loath that she was always in his shadow, she was a force to be reckoned with. They may be a power couple, but she deserves her own recognition.
As for Tim Walz, Tim is just too common and uninteresting. Walz has character and it’s close to waltz.
It’s pronounced like “walls” though 🤔
That drove me crazy in 2016 and I’ve been pleasantly surprised that, outside of weirdos on Twitter, it’s mostly been called the HARRIS campaign.