• Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Anyone who looks at a situation where nobody died, and thinks it would have been better if people had been killed, is a violent person and a danger to others.

    • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s not true, there are plenty of people who if they just fuckin’ keeled over the world would be a better place.

      That being said I don’t think shooting into a crowd of teenagers is the solution, though if I was being beaten by a crowd of them I might change my mind. Call me violent but IMO if it came between me and a crowd of fucking cishets, I know my choice.

      Either way the guys a nuclear dofus for leaving his car. I mean what are you going to do, fucking scold them?

    • ravhall@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      🤷‍♂️ I guess that’s the conclusion I have when people bothsides this kinda bullshit.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Look, there are literally two sides here. The situation that actually happened, and the situation you think would have been better.

        Nobody died in reality, but your solution involves death, so I guess the real issue here is that you picked a side, and it’s a morally reprehensible one.