The alarms have kinda been sounding since Trump declared his candidacy. I can only hope the FBI et al. are doing their jobs and preparing to counter insurrection, and that the National Guard are on alert.
That’s a poor paraphrasing of what I said. I’m not going to the capital with a gun. All I need is a safe transfer of power to the duly elected president.
The FBI isn’t protecting you from shit because you’re poor like the rest of us. Buy a gun for self defense.
Not understanding is a choice you’ve made. I’m fine with your choice. But, pretending it’s a failure to communicate on my part is the sort of gaslighting that’ll alienate many, online and IRL.
I don’t think it’s a failure to communicate. I think it’s a case of you injecting your agenda where it doesn’t apply because you want a soapbox to stand on. That is off-putting and alienating. Chime in with your spiel when it’s appropriate to the context. Police protecting me has nothing to do with presidential succession and it’s weird to bring it up in that context.
In another context I might well agree with you, but right now it feels like an attempt to redirect to make this about your agenda. You don’t need me for that.
The alarms have kinda been sounding since Trump declared his candidacy. I can only hope the FBI et al. are doing their jobs and preparing to counter insurrection, and that the National Guard are on alert.
A lot longer than that…
If you’re rich then you’re well protected. If not, buy a gun for self defense.
That’s a poor paraphrasing of what I said. I’m not going to the capital with a gun. All I need is a safe transfer of power to the duly elected president.
To the capital? No need. The threats already at my door.
You’ve got some kind of agenda here and I don’t even know if I agree with it or not, but it has nothing to do with what I said here.
The FBI isn’t protecting you from shit because you’re poor like the rest of us. Buy a gun for self defense.
Not understanding is a choice you’ve made. I’m fine with your choice. But, pretending it’s a failure to communicate on my part is the sort of gaslighting that’ll alienate many, online and IRL.
I don’t think it’s a failure to communicate. I think it’s a case of you injecting your agenda where it doesn’t apply because you want a soapbox to stand on. That is off-putting and alienating. Chime in with your spiel when it’s appropriate to the context. Police protecting me has nothing to do with presidential succession and it’s weird to bring it up in that context.
In another context I might well agree with you, but right now it feels like an attempt to redirect to make this about your agenda. You don’t need me for that.
I see. Anything you don’t like is an “agenda” warranting ad hominem.
Recognize that you are trying to make a social point as you socially flail.
Silly goose. You don’t know what you’re talking about. But please do be armed and ready! I appreciate that much.
What, the squirrels?
No, neoliberal minimization.
The concept of neoliberal minimization is at your doorstep and you need a gun to defend yourself from it? Lmao.
Found the gun manufacturer!