• nonailsleft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s no way they’re just going to accept incoming rockets as a part of normal life. As long as Hezbollah keeps attacking them, they are going to retaliate

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “As long as Israel keeps bombing their country, they are going to retaliate.”

      The cycle of violence continues.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, if you convince yourself that it was Israel that restarted it on oct 8th, I’m sure you can get some solid sleep

        (while people actually living there don’t have that privilege)

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Likewise if you can pretend all history only started October 7 then you can make yourself sound like the victim. But we both know better, I assume?

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            48 minutes ago

            I’m making myself sound like the victim?

            It’s weird that you want to sound concerned about the cycle of violence continuing and then want to argue that last October doesn’t really matter

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Change rockets to airstrikes and ethnic cleansing and Hezbollah to Israel and you’ll understand how everyone in the region feels about Israel.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do you think the current situation is going to turn out better than if Hezbollah hadn’t attacked?

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Do you think hezbollah is attacking because of the ethnic cleansing already going on via “settlers” or nah?

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I think Hezbollah was fantasizing about doing some ethnic cleansing from the moment they were formed

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          In Lebanon? Probably not, by definition. In Palestine? Almost definitely yes.

          Edited because I misread/misinterpreted better as worse.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Can you explain how this is going to turn out ‘better’ for Lebanon? Innocent Lebanese (unless your point is there aren’t any?) are dying every day

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Can you explain how this is going to turn out ‘better’ for Palestine? I’d say that it just further discredits the call for a two-state solution

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  First, it takes heat off Gaza and the West Bank, especially if the conflict escalates further. Second,

                  I’d say that it just further discredits the call for a two-state solution

                  how so? Discredits the call for a two state solution according to who and for what reason?

                  • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    It could prolong the war in Gaza, but unless Hezbollah mobilise their fighters for a ground invasion I think Israel has more than enough planes for both Gaza and striking back at launch sites etc. The main burden for Israel isn’t military but it’s the 100k refugees, which seems to be the reason they’re turning up the heat now

                    It undermines a two-state solution because that would require the Arab nationalists to accept the state of Israel and, more importantly, stop attacking it. It’s clear that Hamas and Islamic Jihad are never going to do that. And Hezbollah immediately attacking Israel in support of them after a major attack just shows that they too won’t ever be able to agree to a normal relation