• Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    On the other side, I gladly take my Outlander off the beaten track. I took it through a river crossing last month that I probably shouldn’t have. It handled it like a champion, though.

    I don’t know whether I’d take one of these through that same crossing.

    • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      … You wouldn’t take a Shark through a crossing that an Outlander can handle? :-\

      Outlander has 190mm of ground clearance and a wading depth of 400mm, the Shark has 230mm of ground clearance and a wading depth of 600mm (or 700mm, depending on which website you believe).

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        It’s not a dig at the Shark, specifically. It’s my lack of familiarity with electric vehicles in general. I’ve never seen an electric vehicle drive through water.

        The depth of the water was about the height of the wheels. Which I’m guessing is past 400mm. I probably wouldn’t have taken the car along that road to that crossing if I’d known about it ahead of getting there. I was already calculating the odds of getting across and what I’d do if I got bogged down in the water etc.