This is what happens when successive US governments fail to tackle inequality. While millions of people live in poverty, a handful grow unimaginably rich. Wealth begets wealth, and they acquire political power to match. It was inevitable that one of them – now the richest man on Earth – would launch what looks like a bid for world domination…

  • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 days ago

    Free and fair elections, rule of law, stable governmental institutions, individual freedoms, and a free and independent press. Just to give a few academic measures.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Free and fair elections,

      Manipulated by advertising, marketing and propaganda paid by the wealthiest contributors to influence the population. Creating an environment where money and wealth get to decide who gets elected.

      rule of law,

      That can be side stepped, controlled or manipulated by those with wealth and used as a weapon against those with little or no money

      stable governmental institutions,

      That are heavily lobbied, influenced and controlled by those with wealth or corporations and seldom represent the actual will of the people

      individual freedoms,

      Which are constantly challenged or questioned by those with power in an effort to control and manipulate everyone into conforming into inequalitable classes of people.

      and a free and independent press.

      My favorite on this list … free and independent press which are all owned and controlled by the wealthiest billionaires or corporations who allow their media to speak freely as long as they don’t affect their bottom line.

      • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 days ago

        I strongly agree that all of these are under threat or direct attack in the U.S., if that’s your point. But these are some of the measures by which academics evaluate whether governments are “democratic” nonetheless. The U.S. in particular was much stronger on these measures twenty years ago than it is today.