• ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Without rank choice voting any progressive party would act as a spoiler for the Democratic Party. Debilitating ourselves in this way isn’t particularly useful for leveraging power to create better outcomes for the environment and minorities.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Then the Democratic Party had best make sure that progressives have no reason to split off and form their own party, huh?

      Why does it always fall to progressives to get behind Democrats and never the other way around?

      Debilitating ourselves in this way isn’t particularly useful for leveraging power to create better outcomes for the environment and minorities.

      Oh thank god Democrats don’t throw vulnerable populations under the bus every chance they get.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Then the Democratic Party had best make sure that progressives have no reason to split off and form their own party, huh?

        The FPTP voting system ensures that they do not have a reason.

        Why does it always fall to progressives to get behind Democrats and never the other way around?

        The FPTP voting system and entrenchment of neoliberalism in the minds of the American public for over 40 years from both mainstream political parties starting with Regan. This is may be the case for western countries and democracies more broadly as well. Currently, neoliberal ideas cause a contradiction when a person encounters progressive or socialist ideas. Along the lines of:

        Why would we fix our institutions if they are flawless? What’s the hurry to solve our problems if we are at the end of history?

        Some useful and correct resolutions of these contradictions are:

        Our institutions are flawed because they were made by us, flawed humans. The time to advert climate change, fix systemic inequalities, the reduce the wealth gap is now. Incremental changes will run out the clock, as they don’t address the root causes. There will be hundreds of millions if not billions of causalities unless these issues are addressed sooner rather than later.

        Neoliberal ideas must be pulled from the minds of Americans like a weed. Or like one of those radishes in Super Mario Bros 2. Then people will be able to embrace ideas like systemic change to institutions and wealth redistribution from the rich to everyone else.

        When asked about socialism, if a person responds with ‘socialism doesn’t work’ or ‘the Soviet Union collapsed’ those are the tells that a person needs to full internalize neoliberalism as a scam.

        And maybe a history lesson about how the Soviet Union was actually an authoritarian communist dictatorship and not a socialist country. The government owned the means of the production, not the people, and the government wasn’t representative of the people.

        Oh thank god Democrats don’t throw vulnerable populations under the bus every chance they get.

        It’s better than the Democrats intentionally murdering people in camps. Neoliberals in office aren’t going to solve our problems, but it gives us time to do the work to solve them. Like educating people and co-opting the Democratic Party in one of their primaries. Like Trump did to the Republicans and Bernie tried to do to the Democrats.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s better than the Democrats intentionally murdering people in camps.

          The would in a heartbeat if they thought they could get one Republican vote for doing so.

          Neoliberals in office aren’t going to solve our problems, but it gives us time to do the work to solve them.

          Neoliberals ARE our problem. We’ve had half a century of incrementalists demanding that we just wait a little more for them to get around to moving the needle to the left, and instead they move so far to the right that they’re buddy-buddy with Netanyahu and the Cheneys. Incrementalism says “too soon” until it’s too late.

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            The would in a heartbeat if they thought they could get one Republican vote for doing so.

            Again, don’t lie. The Democratic Party can of course move that far, but they have yet to do so.

            Neoliberals ARE our problem.

            Neoliberalism is the problem. Neoliberals can be tomorrow’s socialists. But we have to put in the work and educate people. My argument already refuted this point, I recommend reading it.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Again, don’t lie. The Democratic Party can of course move that far, but they have yet to do so.

              Just wait. Incrementalism will get you there.

              Neoliberalism is the problem. Neoliberals can be tomorrow’s socialists

              You have unfounded faith in neolliberals’ willingness to move any direction other than right.

              • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                If your arguments actually referenced mine in any meaningful way you would know I have addressed these points in this comment section multiple times. As it stands, a casual refutation of your arguments is now sufficient. edit: typo

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  I have addressed these points in this comment section multiple times.

                  Yes, with “leverage power we don’t have against people who would rather lose than stop throwing people under the bus.”

                  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    We do have this power. We elected Joe Biden in 2020. Your argument pretends we don’t at the expense of minorities and our ability to prevent the worst outcomes of climate change.

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      A few weeks ago, I’d have agreed with you, but now? The Democratic party that just lost 10 million votes… We’ll spoil that party? The one that just lost a fair election to a convicted felon? You want to protect them from being spoiled?

      We have 4 years, which is, again, the most time we’ll ever get to try something like this because that’s how 4 year election cycles work. What is it exactly that they’re doing successfully you don’t want to spoil?

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        We’ll spoil that party?

        Yes, running third party candidates in a FPTP voting system is how the spoiler effect works.

        You want to protect them from being spoiled?

        Because of the FPTP voting system our democracy will always trend towards a two-party system. Until we enact systemic change, we will be stuck with the Democrats and the Republicans. As long as the Democrats are further to the left of fascism we should vote for them and avoid limiting our power with third party candidates.

        We the people and our interests are what avoiding the spoiler effect protects.

        What is it exactly that they’re doing successfully you don’t want to spoil?

        The Democrats are neoliberals. They are easier to push on social issues and the environment. The Democratic Party is the party progressives and socialists are going to want to co-opt with a populist candidate. Like Bernie tried to do and Trump did to the Republicans. But more to the point, they do not want to kill minorities and destroy the environment.

        Rather than seeking a moral victory over Democrats we should look for ways to leverage power for the people Republicans want to hurt. Doing otherwise makes the harm done to minorities the cost of doing business.

        • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I mean yes, that’s been the playbook for 8 years. More like 16 if you count what people actually thought Obama was going to be (and had record turn out). Try, try again?

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            The lives of millions of minorities and the Earth’s climate are at stake now. Minorities will notice the difference in the short term, but we will all notice the difference in the long term. Assuming we still have elections and a Democratic Party going forward, yes. We delay fascism and co-opt the Democratic Party. edit: typos

            • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Look, I don’t know if you guys haven’t been paying attention but places have been getting ravaged for decades because of what we’ve been doing. Everyone around me was flabbergasted with what happened in the NC western mountains. They videos were exactly like those I’ve been seeing in the Philippines and other countries that we just completely ignore when there’s a natural disaster (maybe a 30 second blip in the media headline for 80% of it if they’re in a really poor region).

              The Western mountains were devastated because of the infrastructure in natural valleys and huge amounts of sediment deposited by centuries of mining those mountains out (you can see the natural rock formations that returned, lots of people know the land they built on wasn’t there before it was developed). The hurricane wasn’t man made, but everything fucking else about that catastrophe was because of our activity.

              I don’t know what the answer is, but I’ve been waiting for the democrat heroes to save the day since I started voting during Bush’s administration that I was thoroughly against and thought our invasion of Iraq was a war crime. Now we continue to this day with a never ending war machine and a corporation first politics that hasn’t ever changed. I’m all for us talking about some alternatives and pushing for everything and anything right now, not waiting to form something later to help “sway” the democrats policies (which it really didn’t in the long run did it?)

              • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Look, I don’t know if you guys haven’t been paying attention

                I’ve been talking to people about climate change on this site.

                (which it really didn’t in the long run did it?)

                If we give up before we succeed then that’s a self-fulfilling prophecy. The Democrats are neoliberals. They aren’t going to solve our problems. But them being in power will give us the time to educate people and co-opt their party.

                I give my argument about what that involves in more detail in this same comment section here: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/11577918

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s adorable that you expect anyone to buy that the Democratic Party is movable after they just spent a whole ass year refusing to budge on fucking genocide.

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The Democratic Party is the party progressives and socialists are going to want to co-opt with a populist candidate. Like Bernie tried to do and Trump did to the Republicans.

            This is the key part I recommend you read.

            Also, this is off topic, but Harris did pledge to end the war. It was in the news. She called for a ceasefire at least three times. If you care about the Palestinians, then voting for the party that wants to end the war is more useful than allowing the party that wants Israel to finish the job to take power.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              The Democratic Party is the party progressives and socialists are going to want to co-opt with a populist candidate. Like Bernie tried to do and Trump did to the Republicans.

              This is the key part I recommend you read.

              I read it. Democrats will keep playing the left for fools and moving to the right, no matter what happens.

              Also, this is off topic, but Harris did pledge to end the war. It was in the news. She called for a ceasefire at least three times.

              BIDEN called for a ceasefire. With the same complete lack of conviction. There was no daylight between her and Biden on Netanyahu’s genocide.

              If you care about the Palestinians, then voting for the party that wants to end the war is more useful than allowing the party that wants Israel to finish the job to take power.

              I voted for Harris and the election is over. That doesn’t mean I’m going to pretend that she wasn’t as committed to Netanyahu’s genocide as Biden was.

              • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I read it. Democrats will keep playing the left for fools and moving to the right, no matter what happens.

                No Bernie’s campaign and Warren’s campaign drove Biden to the left on a whole host of issues, including labor unions.

                There was no daylight between her and Biden on Netanyahu’s genocide.

                Don’t lie.

                This comment said it best and lists calls for a ceasefire from Harris.

                https://lemmy.world/comment/13069715

                She’s taken a stance, multiple times. The left doesn’t want to hear it.

                March - https://www.npr.org/2024/03/04/1234822836/kamala-harris-benny-gantz-gaza-cease-fire-israel-hamas

                July - https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/25/harris-netanyahu-israel-cease-fire-00171315

                September - https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/harris-trump-presidential-debate-election-2024/card/harris-calls-for-ceasefire-in-gaza-while-trump-claims-she-hates-israel--isokhfqmy6EgRGrUOSuK

                Harris promised to do everything in her power to end the war in Gaza.

                “This year has been difficult, given the scale of death and destruction in Gaza and given the civilian casualties and displacement in Lebanon, it is devastating. And as president, I will do everything in my power to end the war in Gaza, to bring home the hostages, end the suffering in Gaza, ensure Israel is secure, and ensure the Palestinian people can realise their right to dignity, freedom, security and self-determination,” Harris said to applause during a rally in East Lansing city of Michigan, home to 200,000 Arab Americans.

                https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/11/4/harris-says-will-end-gaza-war-in-final-election-appeal-to-arab-americans

                Unlike Biden, Harris was not a life long Zionist.

                When Joe Biden met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his war cabinet during his visit to Israel, the U.S. president assured them: “I don’t believe you have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, and I am a Zionist.”

                https://www.reuters.com/world/us/i-am-zionist-how-joe-bidens-lifelong-bond-with-israel-shapes-war-policy-2023-10-21/

                Harris wasn’t perfect. And that was simply not good enough for some people who didn’t want to risk their hands getting dirty. Even if it meant the Palestinians becoming the cost of doing business.

                I voted for Harris and the election is over. That doesn’t mean I’m going to pretend that she wasn’t as committed to Netanyahu’s genocide as Biden was.

                Good for you. I appreciate it. No need to spread propaganda though.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Don’t lie.

                  I’m not. Biden pretended to want a ceasefire just like Harris did. There was NO daylight between the two. None. She presented NO policy differences on Gaza from Biden. Not one.

                  And I no longer trust promises without policy behind them. Democrats are great at promising shit they have no intention of doing and then gleefully announcing that their hands are tied.

                  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    I’m not.

                    You are. I even gave the receipts. They were different, but people on the left didn’t want to hear it.

                    Democrats are great at promising shit they have no intention of doing and then gleefully announcing that their hands are tied.

                    That’s what a refusal to remove the filibuster and a razor thin majority will do. Manchin and Sinema were devastatingly effective in their obstruction. That’s what a systemic issue can do in a nutshell. With the Senate, a tiny minority can overturn the will of the majority. Our refusal to fix it is part of how we got here. And things will continue to get worse if we don’t take steps to fix it.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The Tea Party did not spoil a GOP election. The GOP caved and adopted their platform.

      The Democratic Party will do the same thing with the Guillotine Party.