I’ve read the first two books and enjoyed them both. I enjoyed the TV series. But I see there are nine novels and eight novellas in the series, and I know the book series goes on longer than the TV series. I’m curious: is the quality fairly consistent or, like a lot of longer book series, does it degrade over time?

Edit: Thanks everyone! Sounds like the vast majority of folks enjoyed all of the books - enough that I’ll probably read them all. I have other books on my reading list, so I might take breaks and read some of those in between.

I really appreciate all the responses. Thank you all. Upvotes all around!

  • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Having read all of them, I think of these books as three different sets:

    • Books 1-6 of the main series basically cover the same time period as the TV show. If you enjoyed the first two books, it’s extremely likely that you will enjoy books 3-6. The primary story arc started in book 1 comes to a very satisfying conclusion in book 6, broadly the same as it did in the show.
    • Books 7-9 are more like a sequel series than a direct continuation of book 1-6. The primary characters return but it’s really a new story arc. Personally I read book 7 at release, then later bounced off book 8 when it came out however many months later. It was only when I came back to reread the entire series that books 7-9 clicked for me. For my money everything came to a satisfying conclusion in book 9, with answers to most of the bigger mysteries behind the entire series (i.e. who built the rings, how did they build them, who killed the ring builders, etc.).
    • The novellas and short stories focus on backstories and side characters. I particularly liked that they reveal where certain side characters eventually ended up; not naming any names for spoiler reasons. Memory’s Legion collects all of these into a single book-length collection, which is probably the best way to get them.

    TL;DR book 1-6 for sure for sure, books 7-9 probably, novellas if you go through books 1-9 and still want more.

    • joshthewaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read them all at once and it’s been a while but overall I enjoyed them. Definitely felt like it went on longer than maybe it needed to which is probably why I didn’t bother with the short stories. I would still recommend the books.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seems like an unpopular opinion, but I quit after 3 books. The first book was great, the second not as good, the third confirmed some consistent discouraging writing patterns from the second.

    My biggest complaint is that I started the series for the sci-fi concepts and plotlines, but it quickly became a standard political procedural, with action and drip-reveal mystery elements, and the actual sci-fi elements felt unnecessary and incidental. Or to put it a different way, with rare exceptions, there just weren’t reliable sci-fi “big ideas” introduced after the first book, just a lot of human drama and plot that felt like it didn’t require the sci-fi setting.

    I also felt like some pacing was off and there was a ton of filler. What confirmed that for me was when I noticed the chapter dividers in my reading app and saw nearly every chapter was almost identical length. My guess is the authors worked backwards from a chapter outline with a planned word count for publisher deliverables. If that type of planning sounds more like a business then it does art, I’d say that’s actually my experience reading it too.

    Finally, one of my pet peeves for any type of believable drama is when conflict is created by people acting stupidly. Kind of the opposite of deus ex machina resolution, it’s a transparently artificial conflict that is just meant to give the characters something to do, but lazy writing. I felt that many many times by the second and third books.

    Again, I’m in a minority I guess, but I felt it just wasn’t worth the time. Not as bad as Aurora by Kim Stanley Robinson (my all time worst offender for filler and lazy plot), but lots of squeeze for little juice.

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, that jogs my memory about the different chapters. And that’s a better theory on chapter length, thanks. I think that is the same problem, though: a non-diagetic agreement to format it a certain way, resulting in filler and awkward pacing.

    • AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m with you on your unpopular opinion.

      The third book is a grind to finish. I say that because I’m grinding to finish it. I plan to start #4, hoping the writers learn from their experience and bring back compelling storytelling.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t get better. The rest of the series, bar the novellas, is a slog. It took me several months, around fifteen other books, and a vacation to get through the whole series.

    • mcteazy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been listening to the audio books when I do my 10 h drive home for vacations/holidays and I watched the show first. I’m on book 7 now.

      I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed book 1 and 2, but 3 through 6 I did find tedious to get through having seen the show and knowing what happens. I’m enjoying 7 again with a fresh story.

      Personally, one of my favourite things about the series is the realism of the sci-fi setting and the use as a setting for a political drama.

      Sort of agree on the filler and formulaic type writing as well, but I haven’t noticed it as much with some fresh plot development

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I’d say that’s unpopular, no one can keep the same amount of “new Sci fi” concepts continously. And for me it’s still worth a read, because they created a universe with a set of rules (keep protomolecule aside for now) that apply to all humans everywhere. And they never forgot that, not in any books, no stupid gravity generators, no ships appearing magically from somewhere, and they were consistent with that to the end.

      That in my mind will always have a special place. And I’ll always keep recommending expanse for anyone that cares about a bit sensible physics in their fantasy.

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, that’s great. I’m glad you enjoyed it. Different readers are looking for different things.

        I think a good example of sci-fi that can keep up the “new sci-fi concepts continuously” is the Three Body Problem trilogy, if you haven’t read it yet.

        • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have read rememberance of earth’s past trilogy. Well continously here meant for 9 books, If a series wanted to stop at 3 books a lot easier to manage new sci-fi topics. But if you are looking for something that is going for a while, I don’t think there are any good ones other than expanse.

          Happy to be proven wrong.

  • TheDeadSaiyan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just finished last month and it’s one of the best series I’ve ever read. I haven’t read the novellas so after some time I will reread the series with them included.

  • Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could not set them down… except the last one. Jumping 25 years into the future was a strange choice and, for me, less entertaining.

  • Aztechnology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I loved the series

    Some of the short stories are hit or miss but they are short and worth reading either way and only short

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in the middle of book 7 and holy what a shift. I’m in the part where it’s so overwhelming, you can’t even begin to imagine how this will get resolved. Very excited to read the last two books.

  • DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only regret about any of that is the show didn’t do the last 3 books any justice. Otherwise, you are in for a treat.

    After you enjoy the experience, try Alastair Reynolds’ Revelation Space series. If you liked Amos and Bobbie, you’ll be rooting and cheering for Scorpio and Nevile Clavain in no time.

    • GeekinKorea@dice.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      @DaMonsterKnees @AFKBRBChocolate They didn’t do the last three books at all really. That particular set of book events was beginning to be set up, but involves a significant time jump. If The Expanse returned as a series later, it could be done with the original cast, but seems highly unlikely now.

      Highly worth the effort. What they managed to finish was done well enough.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know i just want to read those books for the first time again. Second and third runs are nice, but not as great as the first one where your brain just explodes.