• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are very strong lingering effects which mean women, on average, are paid less.

    It’s especially hard on women in various countries where they’re now expected to both have a successful career and be the primary child caregiver. Which is as ridiculous as it sounds.

    However, one example of advocacy from a cafe in my city of Melbourne Australia a number of years ago really rubbed me the wrong way: when a cafe decided to charge like 25% more to men (inverse of 80%). I was a close to minimum wage worker at the time (in Australia, before the cost of living skyrocket, so I wasn’t starving), and it annoyed me because if I went in, I would be asked to pay more because I was a man, never mind the fact I would likely be earning far less than many women going in there.

    The wage gap is 100% real, and things should definitely be done to make all genders pay more equitable. But hell, the class divide is orders of magnitude worse, and we ought not forget it.

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sounds like it’s similar to here. I would have thought we narrowed the gap by now but apparently not. The child caregiver trends are definitely behind along with a host of other gender norms.

      Lol that pricing scheme sounds great, easily a sketch comedy premise from Portlandia, BackBerner, SNL, etc

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        To be fair, it was “optional” (but let’s be real, you wouldn’t want to be that guy). And done temporarily for publicity.

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          Ah I see, like grocers requiring that employees solicit donations at every checkout to reduce global food insecurity (and the grocer’s tax burden), it’s only technically optional.