• vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wish more companies had this mindset. If you treat your employees well and listen to their needs, they won’t need to unionize. When they do unionize, it means they don’t feel that they have been treated well and listened to.

    It seems that the end result of this philosophy would be to treat your employees well!

    • kiterios@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you have an employer that does the right thing, you should have a union that doesn’t need to do much. But you should still unionise, because it’s niave to think the company will always continue to behave that way. If anything, they naturally drift away from that state and it’s only a matter of time until it changes. The union is about having a level playing field with the company when you need it.

    • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Unionize it’s not only about raising your working conditions. It’s about helping other to raise theirs. If you have better conditions you can tell other business owners that what the Union is asking, you already have it. One less point where they can grab themselves.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      its an interesting difference in perspective for sure. here you join as a matter of course because you can push back against changes that are bad.