Summary

ABC News faces bipartisan backlash after settling a $15M defamation lawsuit with Donald Trump over anchor George Stephanopoulos’s inaccurate claim that Trump was “found liable for rape” in E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits.

The settlement includes a public apology, $1M in legal fees, and a $15M donation to Trump’s presidential library.

Critics, including legal experts and political figures, accuse ABC of prioritizing profit over principle, arguing the case was winnable if litigated.

This follows broader debates on media accountability and legacy outlets’ handling of defamation lawsuits. Trump denies wrongdoing in Carroll’s related cases.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    217
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Was the case winnable? Yeah, almost certainly.

    Would the upcoming administration try to get revenge after losing a high profile case like this? Also almost certain.

    ABCs bean counters realized that $15M as a donation would be cheaper than trying to fight the government constantly over the next 4 years.

    You voted for this.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      168
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Complying in advance is how we get fascist government.

      That is the first lesson in “On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons From the 20th Century” by Prof. Snyder

      This is sign that our media completely capitulated and won’t even try to fight to preserve our democracy.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 days ago

        The country already knowingly voted for the fascists, just under the thought that “they’re our kind of fascists”

      • Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        You’re not wrong, but ABC is definitely not trying to fight tyranny. They’re a corporation with the sole goal of making money. This has been true of basically any US media company since the Reagan administration.

        ABC is looking to literally buy some goodwill so that they can continue to make money after Trump’s term.

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 days ago

        Traditional media hasn’t tried to preserve anything other than whatever spin on a story gets the most views and clicks. Independent media are the ones we all need to look out for and tune into now.

        A good example from the tech world is GamersNexus.

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, after reading his books I now scheduled recurring donations for ProPublica, NPR and also an subscribed to a local news paper that still does some real journalism.

      • trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Complying in advance is how we get fascist government.

        Apparently we don’t have to do anything as advanced as that to get one. Because the American people would just as easily vote one in.

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        If you’re looking for media to fight for democracy, I think you’re looking in the wrong place. Media is supposed to present the news. Then people can act on it.

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          What is happening though is that US news is not presenting the news in an unbiased way.

          • NotAnOnionAtAll@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            There is no such thing as unbiased news. The best you can hope for is a diverse selection of news sources where the biases mostly cancel out in most situations.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Most people did not vote for this. He did not even get 50% of the popular vote. Let’s stop pretending the system doesn’t stack the odds against the people. If we did that we wouldn’t have been afraid to stack the courts, and so on.

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t see how the payment will stop orange man from punishing them (and other media outlets he doesn’t like) anyway.

    • Subtracty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      If media conglomerates with millions of dollars don’t stand up to him, how can they expect any of us to do so effectively.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Would the upcoming administration try to get revenge after losing a high profile case like this? Also almost certain.

      Would the incoming administration try for revenge after winning a case like this? Also almost certain.

      Dunking on weakness is their entire theme.

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also the likelihood of it being winnable goes down a lot the moment Trump takes office. I don’t like it but i understand the decision. Still, we have to fight.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Another perspective is that republicans, democrats and certainly large media companies are all prioritizing profit, polarization and fear.

  • spector@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    5 days ago

    He is the epitome of privilege. A criminal that not only faces no consequences but gets rewarded. A temper tantrum throwing cry baby yet some how doesn’t affect his character (to about half the country).

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because at the time of the judgment, the legal definition of “rape” in the state of New York did not cover what Trump was found to have done to E. Jean Carroll.

      Stephanopoulos didn’t defame Trump. The legal definition of “rape” in NY was wrong, and I believe it has since been changed such that it would have covered Trump’s actions had it been correct at the time of his finding of liability.

      • resin85@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        In NY, rape is legally defined as sexual intercourse. If this were in Florida, it would have been legally defined as rape (unwanted penetration with an object).

        This was nothing more than ABC paying into trump’s protection racket. They absolutely would have won in a trial.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I mean if Joe Biden could make the excuse that he couldn’t let the justice system to take it course, say that the justice system is political, and pardon his son, I mean why in the hell would ABC and George Stephanopoulos run the risk of political retribution also?

    • billbasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Only their sound bytes are trustworthy to an extent. Even then they’ve probably clipped them to fit a narrative.