• chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I guess, the term mass shooting just makes me think of one dude going off the rails.

    The fact that we need subgenres for this shit is disgusting either way.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I still think your distinction is important. They are both tragedies of course, but it’s important to know and understand the cause.

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would just refer to people who “go postal” as rampage killers. Spree killer and mass shooter already have their own definitions after all.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The majority accepted is 4 or more injured or killed, not including the shooter (gun violence archive).

      The DOJ version is 4 or more killed, which is just the mass murder definition with a shooter, leaving out a lot of incidents.

      In either case though, the motive is irrelevant because its not going to be known at the time.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Interestingly, the DOJ version also causes mass killings that made minimal firearm involvement to be on the list.

        It’s why the 7th deadliest “school shooting” was in the mid-18th century, and only one person was actually shot, with the rest killed by melee weapons.