I don’t agree with your take because of how it seems to imply “reverse sexism,” which is odd. If anything, it’s harder to be a woman.
But I do know celebrity culture is weird, and you’ll never talk sense into people who worship a particular celebrity. You’ve got to think of them as meth addicts or something – you can’t just antagonize them because they’ll lash out or shut down.
I don’t agree with your take because of how it seems to imply “reverse sexism,” which is odd. If anything, it’s harder to be a woman.
But I do know celebrity culture is weird, and you’ll never talk sense into people who worship a particular celebrity. You’ve got to think of them as meth addicts or something – you can’t just antagonize them because they’ll lash out or shut down.
Nothing about sex. More to do with how billionaire accepted and others aren’t bc of their political takes.
So i can say left-wing stuff and claim to be a socialist while take actions that prob go against that.
Thats the issue. Virtue signalling. Then i can also claim to be this while build a ton-load of wealth and convince everyone to stay poor.
Your post explicitly says Lemmy users would react as pictured because they only hate male billionaires.
I don’t know what to tell you. See my comment about celebrity worship.
My personal heroes are all family and neighbors. I don’t worship no celebrities.