cows_are_underrated@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoThinkpad for the winfeddit.orgimagemessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up11.45Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.44Karrow-down1imageThinkpad for the winfeddit.orgcows_are_underrated@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square132fedilink
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoNo, none of the X line are. I really like the L line of Thinkpads. Those are still pretty solid and reparable.
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 hours agonah the old x series (e.g. x61, x201) were good, they’re basically just a t series with a smaller display and no disk drive
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoYeah the older ones are. But the new ones compete more with the XPS imo and they suffer for it.
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 hours agoThe L series is the economical line. Not to say they aren’t solid and repairable, but the t and p series are the designed to be the most robust, while the L series is designed to be robust with lower end components
No, none of the X line are. I really like the L line of Thinkpads. Those are still pretty solid and reparable.
nah the old x series (e.g. x61, x201) were good, they’re basically just a t series with a smaller display and no disk drive
Yeah the older ones are. But the new ones compete more with the XPS imo and they suffer for it.
The L series is the economical line.
Not to say they aren’t solid and repairable, but the t and p series are the designed to be the most robust, while the L series is designed to be robust with lower end components