• 30mag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house.

    That is a very good point. I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials with situations like this:

    Ordos, near the border with Mongolia, was meant to hold over 1 million people and become a cultural and economic hub. But by 2016, its population was only around 100,000, and it has been described as “the largest ghost town in the world.”

    • zephyreks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sometimes, you misspeculate. Some developers lost a whole fuck ton of money on the project, but that’s more than made up for if you can turn a profit on projects near big cities (which demand is still sky high for).

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials

      Is anyone? If I have to choose between “housing shortage” and “housing surplus” I know which society I would prefer.

      • 30mag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sure. The point I was trying to make is that society might be better served by allocating resources to building hospitals or schools or something the community needs instead of housing that the community does not necessarily need because there is already a surplus of housing.

        • zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          China isn’t really limited by construction resources. There’s a heavier constraint in terms of hospital staff and teachers than there is on construction resources.

          • 30mag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            China isn’t really limited by construction resources.

            Maybe they aren’t running out of concrete and steel, but they are taking out loans for these construction projects.