Hello selfhosted! Sometimes I have to transfer big files or a large amounts of small files in my homelab. I used rsync but specifying the IP address and the folders and everything is bit fiddly. I thought about writing a bash script but before I do that I wanted to ask you about your favourite way to achieve this. Maybe I am missing out on an awesome tool I wasn’t even thinking about.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    What’s wrong with rsync? If you don’t like IP addresses, use a domain name. If you use certificate authentication, you can tab complete the folders. It’s a really nice UX IMO.

    If you’ll do this a lot, just mount the target directory with sshfs or NFS. Then use rsync or a GUI file manager.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, I mean I do still use rsync for the stuff that would take a long time, but for one-off file movement I just use a mounted network drive in the normal file browser, including on Windows and MacOS machines.

    • theorangeninja@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sounds very straight forward. Do you have a samba docker container running on your server or how do you do that?

        • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah, if OP has command line access through rsync then the server is already configured to allow remote access over NFS or SMB or SSH or FTP or whatever. Setting up a mounted folder through whatever file browser (including the default Windows Explorer in Windows or Finder in MacOS) over the same protocol should be trivial, and not require any additional server side configuration.

      • drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I just type sftp://[ip, domain or SSH alias] into my file manager and browse it as a regular folder

          • drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Linux is truly extensible and it is the part I both love and struggle to explain the most.
            I can sit at my desktop, developing code that physically resides on my server and interact with it from my laptop. This does not require any strange janky setup, it’s just SSH. It’s extensible.

            • blackbrook@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              I love this so much. When I first switched to Linux, being able to just list a bunch of server aliases along with the private key references in my .ssh/config made my life SO much easier then the redundantly maintained and hard to manage putty and winscp configurations in Windows.

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have two servers, one Mac and one Windows. For the Mac I just map directly to the smb share, for the Windows it’s a standard network share. My desktop runs Linux and connects to both with ease.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dont have a docker container, I just have Samba running on the server itself.

        I do have an owncloud container running, which is mapped to a directory. And I have that shared out through samba so I can access it through my file manager. But that’s unnecessary because owncloud is kind of trash.

  • e0qdk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    People have already covered most of the tools I typically use, but one I haven’t seen listed yet that is sometimes convenient is python3 -m http.server which runs a small web server that shares whatever is in the directory you launched it from. I’ve used that to download files onto my phone before when I didn’t have the right USB cables/adapters handy as well as for getting data out of VMs when I didn’t want to bother setting up something more complex.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Honestly, this is an easy way to share files with non-technical people in the outside world, too. Just open up a port for that very specific purpose, send the link to your friend, watch the one file get downloaded, and then close the port and turn off the http server.

      It’s technically not very secure, so it’s a bad idea to leave that unattended, but you can always encrypt a zip file to send it and let that file level encryption kinda make up for lack of network level encryption. And as a one-off thing, you should close up your firewall/port forwarding when you’re done.

  • motsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    smb share if its desktop to desktop. If its from phone to PC, I throw it on nextcloud on the phone, then grab it from the web ui on pc.

    Smb is the way to go if you have identity set up, since your PC auth will carry over for the connection to the smb share. Nextcloud will be less typing if not since you can just have persistent auth on the app / web.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      Solid explorer on android is pretty useful too, it can access the SMB share. I use nextcloud for photo backup, but usually solid explorer for one off file transfers.

  • boreengreen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    rsync is indeed fiddly. Consider SFTP in your GUI of choice. I mount the folder I need in my file browser and grab the files I need. No terminal needed and I can put the folders as favorites in the side bar.

  • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    WinSCP for editing server config

    Rsync for manual transfers over slow connections

    ZFS send/receive for what it was meant for

    Samba for everything else that involves mounting on clients or other servers.

    • boreengreen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      As I understand it, the establishing of the connection is reliant on a relay server. So this would not work on a local network without a relay server and would, by default, try to reach a server on the internet to make connections.

  • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago
    • sftp for quick shit like config files off a random server because its easy and is on by default with sshd in most distros
    • rsync for big one-time moves
    • smb for client-facing network shares
    • NFS for SAN usage (mostly storage for virtual machines)
  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ye old samba share.

    But I do like using Nextcloud. I use it for syncing my video projects so I can pick up where I left off on another computer.