Original reporting by the Globe & Mail is behind a paywall. In any case, it’s not a good look for Poilievre that India boosted his candidacy and then he wouldn’t get security clearance to be informed of this fact.

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Everyone gets to decide what we talk about. PM is no different. Pierre just can’t lie about something that has been made aware of.

      • Jamablaya@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        There’s non disclosure rules if you aren’t the one deciding what is and isn’t secret, don’t play dumb. Fucking CSIS agent letting the globe and mail see what Poilievre couldn’t is election interference.

        • Oderus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          CSIS has the same rules for all leaders. So no, it’s not election interference. Go cry elsewhere.

          • Jamablaya@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Someone illegally released a report, to a person with no security clearance, from three years ago about a failed attempt at vote manipulation, 3 days into an federal election and you seriously think it’s not an influence attempt? Guess you weren’t playing dumb.