• NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    3 days ago

    Could we maybe not attack our LGBTQ+ friends?

    There are much better ways to insult a traitorous piece of shit that doesn’t involve resorting to homophobic language and insults.

    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This isn’t homophobic my friend. Except if you deny cis men bodily pleasures just because you want to categorize them.

      Besides that, he uses it as a prosthetic to keep him upright.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ah, my mistake. I wasn’t aware you were… complimenting schumer for being comfortable with his own sexuality?

        Do better. Our friends need to know we are allies since they are already on the front lines whether they like it or not.

        • flying_mechanic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Implying the presence of a dildo as a structural member(ha) doesn’t negate or speak hatefully about the use of sex toys or people who use them, but it does imply he was being submissive to someone else(GOP). This has nothing to do with LGBTQ+ support. Sex toys don’t belong to just them.

        • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I need to do better? You were the one running to conclusions.

          Relax my dear. Grab a therapeutic massaging device.

      • Sirus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        They need to constantly be the center of attention and a pick-me.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        Schumer is male. The big schoolyard insult is that he has a dildo up his ass.

        There are two ways to interpret that. One is that he is very comfortable with his sexuality and enjoys pressure on his prostate. The other being that he wants to have sex with a man or is “submissive” (and calling THAT an insult is also pretty shitty) and so forth.

        The chud-lites are pretending that it totally wasn’t an insult and they were just giving a non sequitor about how schumer is comfortable in his sexuality and that anyone who thinks they were calling him gay (as an insult) is the real villain. I would say that whether people can even think that with a straight face says a lot about them as a person.

    • hypna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I for one agree that kind of sexualized criticism is inappropriate. I think a reasonable person would read it as trying to demean Schumer by associating him with other-than-straight behavior.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        You are experiencing the downside of free speech, but I’ll take that over being told what I can and cannot say which seems to be what you currently want. I for one dont particularly care what you or nuxcom90_blahblah personally feel verbally offended by – you dont get to tell people which words they are allowed to use.

        • hypna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Criticism is not censorship. You’ll just have to learn to live with the fact that people can tell you when they think you’re being an ass. Free speech, you know.