• Meursault@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 days ago

    Stop, lol. The momentum from the truck is carrying the log forward. Realistically, it isn’t being shot directly into the windshield like a cruise missile.

    Physics!

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Never noticed that the logs fell off the side and bounced! The log would slow and the car would still be hauling ass, right?

      And for those of you scared of log trucks, nothing can make a log slide off the top while driving down the road. They are jammed on there with friction.

      EDIT: The log is still going 65mph (for argument’s sake). You’re still going 65mph (for argument’s sake). The log will slow on the bounce, a little, you’ll jam the brakes and slow more, it will still look like a fucking torpedo.

        • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Brakes can absolutely stop faster than a log falling off a truck. Your reaction time is the main concern.

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Wouldn’t you have about the same reaction time as if the truck was braking tho? I mean, the momentum will carry the log in the direction the truck was going until it dissipates, which is kinda the same as braking.

            I mean, that situation would obviously be dangerous because you don’t wanna stop on a freeway for obvious reasons, but still, if you adhered to common safety rules, you should be okay in that situation, no?

      • Owl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        i’d argue a bouncing log takes a lot longer to slow down than your average car hitting the brakes