Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college’s Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse’s presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even if you don’t think it was murder, it’s repulsive that he is trying to make a career out of killing two people.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the debate is nuanced so I’m not trying to say it’s absolutely equatable, I’m more trying to feel out your actual position.

      If a woman was being abused by her husband, stood up to him and killed him in self defense…if domestic abuse/survivor groups invited her to speak, would it be also repulsive?

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or say that woman armed herself as a child(17 yr old) and walked into a tense situation of strangers untrained and ready to shoot someone… and then ends up shooting someone. Might be a better comparison.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Perfect example. She shoots him with a gun she bought and then brought back home. To the people who think he’s a victim, you’re the one saying “well, she should have left him and certainly not brought the gun into the house!”

          But I understand that the question will be avoided at all costs, because that’s the only way to deal with the cognitive dissonance.

          • bobburger@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You seem to be JAQing off here, but your straw man is pretty weak.

            Let’s say instead the abused woman is safely away from her husband and he can’t harm her any more. Then she illegally obtains a firearm, drives 2 hours to the husband’s place of work, starts a fight with him, and when he starts to get violent with her she the shoots him.

            Do you think this woman is justified in the shooting?