• hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Waaaiit, Puerto Ricans don’t get a vote?

    I’m a dirty foreigner and I’m not too clear on the status of Puerto Rico, but somehow I’d assumed that they’d get to vote in federal elections since they’re a part of the country

    • smort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just a note on the tax part:

      Consequently, while all Puerto Rico residents pay federal taxes, many residents are not required to pay federal income taxes. Aside from income tax, U.S. federal taxes include customs taxes,[1] federal commodity taxes, and federal payroll taxes (Social Security, Medicare, and Unemployment taxes).

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_Puerto_Rico

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Hah that’s true. What would be their equivalent of the Boston Tea Party today? Dump all the Viagra they’ve manufactured in the sea? “Puerto Rico Viagra Party” sounds like a porn title

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They’re a part of the country, in that they are citizens and pay taxes. They don’t have representation in Congress (they send delegates, but those people can’t vote on anything) and they aren’t represented in the electoral college.

      Fun fact, citizens of Washington DC are similarly unrepresented in Congress, but they do get to vote for President.

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve never really understood why DC folks don’t get a vote, but at least I knew about that one (it gets mentioned in movies and series from time to time)

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          DC is a small area entirelt under the ruling of the federal government, and because the government is made up of representatives from states they do not get a vote. The original idea was congress and the federal government shouldn’t be housed under any state laws.

          • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            But I’d assume there’s other folks in DC besides just congresscritters? It just feels weird that you disenfranchise (whew what a word to spell) people when they are state representatives or they happen to live in the place where the congresscritters do their thing.

            I think in general disenfranchising people feels weird to me; I’m Finnish and I’m so used to the idea that literally everybody has a vote no matter what – here all citizens who are over 18 get a vote, whether in parliamentary, presidental, or municipal elections, and the only way to lose your right to vote is to renounce your citizenship. Doesn’t matter whether you’re an ax murderer or a member of parliament (hopefully not both at the same time though.)

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It didn’t matter when DC was 99% swamp, but it’s more of a problem now. My thinking is the people living in DC chose to live there, it’s a very rich area and anyone living in DC has the means to live outside. They knew they wouldn’t have a congressional vote. Also, DC still has municipal elections.