• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re not doing their supporters any favours with these sort of comments lol

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s easy to support Palestinian statehood. Anyone that supports Hamas is a moron.

          • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fucking deranged tankies man, their Lord and Savior Hasan Abi has been going off about how “baby settlers” are valid military targets. These people yearn to live under a propaganda-military dictatorship.

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s crazy because I’m pretty sure a lot of them would be considered “undesirables” in the societies they claim to want to live in.

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bro like literally 90% of Lemmy has a throbbing boner for Hamas and his stated antisemitic terrorists, even in this thread, terrorists apologizers abound

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Weird that as a Jew who is pretty damn sensitive to antisemitism since I faced a lot of it growing up in religious Indiana, I haven’t noticed this support for antisemitic terrorists on Lemmy. I’ve seen a lot of support for innocent people being slaughtered because of Israel’s response to antisemitic terrorists, but that’s a separate issue.

            People in the U.S. protested the war in Afghanistan. Does that mean they supported Al Qaeda? Because this is some real “you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists” thinking from my perspective.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering Hamas is the organization governing Gaza right now, the two are often intertwined in these discussions

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Under any solution (one or two state), Hamas will be the ones in power and representing the Palestinian block. Doesn’t matter if they do a good job of it or not.

              • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They are the de facto (and kind of de jure…) government of Gaza. Hell, they run the Health Ministry that provides a lot of the updates.

                If this somehow ends with anything short of further subjugation and/or eradication, they will be “heroes”. And they aren’t going to lessen their hold on the Palestinian people.

                • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They were also very unpopular before Oct 7 and I doubt they’ve gotten any more popular since then.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It seems to me that Hamas “governs” Palestine the same way groups like the Mafia or Yakuza “govern” the people they extort.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Almost 20 years ago, when the majority of Palestinians alive today were either too young to vote or hadn’t even been born. How long after an election do you assume elected leaders have any real mandate?

              • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                My point was that regardless of their ability to do it, they were at one time the elected officials of the geographic location known as Gaza. They’re obviously not a real government in policy and action, but they’re the only thing that exists to even bear the term or concept of governance in the area.

                There is no other group to be considered as the government, no matter how awful Hamas is at being a government of any variety.

                • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  At one time, yes, but I don’t think we should be holding the Palestinians today to that. That would be like the Dubya era. If he had kept office until now, he would certainly not represent the opinion of Americans.

                  Hamas is embedded like a parasite, but there’s better ways to point this out.

            • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Like over a decade ago but they havent held elections since. I’ve seen countering articles saying Hamas has overwhelming support by the people, vs actually Hamas murders anyone who goes against them. So who knows. Fog of war and all that.

              • Tavarin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                actually Hamas murders anyone who goes against them

                Well that would result in them having overwhelming support, among the survivors that is.

    • guacupado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      They shouldn’t have any fucking supporters. This is the shit all the anti-Israel people are supporting. I’m no fan of Netanyahu but wtf do they expect Israel to do? It’s like everyone forgot what prompted this and thinks Israel just woke up one morning and decided to raze everything because they were bored.

      • Serdan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m no fan of Netanyahu but wtf do they expect Israel to do?

        I expect them not to commit war crimes at a bare minimum.

      • Elliott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you suggesting that when Israel bombs a refugee camp and kills all those innocent people that somehow that is a reasonable response?

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a disproportionate response, and misdirected. But it is definitely a response to something real, which the more rabid anti-Israel types seem to gloss over.

        • smokingManhole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

          What did you expect? Do you think that hitting a wasp nest with a rod just once means you’ll only be stung once because you only hit it once? There’s no rule stating that the wasps must respond with equal magnitude. If people are now getting hurt, it’s because someone provoked the wasps. The notion that reactions must be proportionate to the offense is quite naive.

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Idk what’s more hilarious here, the implication that a Palestinian baby deserves to die because of what Hamas did or the implication that Jews are hyperaggressive animals that are completely incapable of moral reasoning.

            • smokingManhole@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you focusing solely on the casualties involving children? Does that mean any location with children is off-limits for retaliation, providing a shield for adversaries because children are present? This is not a simple game of hide and seek, nor is it your idealistic world where a slap is met with a turned cheek.

              It’s a common misconception that supporters of Israel are indifferent to the death of children or any civilian, for that matter, and you seem to be perpetuating this narrative. You choose the most objectionable point about an opponent to make an accusation, and, much like someone obstinately arguing without listening to reason, you consider yourself morally superior and in the right.

              What, in your opinion, would be a suitable response to an attack from Hamas? Would peaceful protests, international condemnation, or sanctions suffice?

              If you’ve discarded your spine, don’t assume everyone else has done the same. An entity without the ability to react appropriately can only succumb.

          • theluckyone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If I get stung by a wasp nest sitting on my neighbor’s house, I do not have the right to burn down my neighbor’s house with them in it.

            Hamas, the IDF, and the Israeli are all murderers. They all have blood on their hands.

            • smokingManhole@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your narrative would hold if it weren’t flawed; it’s an oversimplification. Let’s take your perspective where Hamas is the bees that stung Israel, and now Israel is retaliating against the land harboring the bee nest. (I use ‘bees’ here to distinguish from my earlier wasp analogy).

              If your neighbor disliked the bees as much as you and agreed the nest was a problem, then certainly, destroying it with care to avoid collateral damage would be wise. However, the situation changes if your neighbor is a beekeeper who shields the bees in his home to protect them from you. If those bees become aggressive and harm your family, naturally, you’d first request the neighbor to remove the bees. Should they refuse, you’d have every right to seek external help. But what if the authorities do little, leaving you to suffer the stings while your neighbor faces minimal consequences? Rather than passively endure this, you might feel compelled to act independently to prevent future stings and deter the beekeeper from maintaining this threat.

              • theluckyone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Bullshit.

                No government nor military should not get a carte blanche for murdering innocent civilians in the process of fighting a terrorist organization.

                If you can’t figure that one out on your own, I’m not debating with you.

                • smokingManhole@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Okay, then let’s hypothetically say Israel forms a terrorist organization that doesn’t overlap with the Israeli government itself, would they then have the right to attack Gaza? This organization would essentially be in the same position relative to Israel as Hamas is to the Palestinians.

                  The way you debate reminds me of someone who might have abandoned their education prematurely. Are you going to complain to the teacher because you cannot acknowledge that your reasoning is flawed, incomplete, and biased? Your approach to this discussion is quite frankly, absurd.

        • Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          These fuckers kidnapped US citizens, they deserve 100% of whatever bombs we throw at them until our people are freed.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        being both anti-israel and anti-hamas at the same time is the only correct position i don’t understand why this isn’t obvious

        • Cowars@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because Hamas is the only resistance Palestinians have against the colonizer.

          • nutsack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            it isn’t, actually. they have a government with a prime minister and a president which oppose hamas and which netanyahu wants nobody to pay attention to because they are the legitimate path to statehood

            • Cowars@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well then Netanyahu is doing a great job because I heard that Hamas was elected by the palestinians and I never heard about another Palestinian government.

              • nutsack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                it was elected a long time ago and since then they have fallen out of favor and there was never an election again

      • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What prompted this? You mean the decades of occupation? Or are you suggesting history only began with the Hamas attack?

      • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        You just gotta take that line of thought one step further. I believe in you.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, that not totally incorrect. The settlers starting moving in (before the nation was a thing) and started killing and displacing the existing inhabitants. It’s been bad from the start, though they have had periods that are better than others. People excuse Israel for what Hamas has done, but rarely do those same people forgive Hamas for what the Jewish settlers have done.

        Personally, I don’t make a judgment on Hamas. They are a much weaker force against a much stronger force. If they fight a conventional war then they don’t stand a chance. Gorilla warfare/terrorism is the only viable option for them. Israel uses terrorism every day, but it’s only bad when Hamas does it?

        I do judge Israel. They are a strong force, and more importantly are getting support from many other powerful nations. Until my country (the US) stops sending support, I will criticize their actions. I do not condone my money going towards what they do.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which supporters?

        People supporting the Palestinian side in this conflict

        • Five@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t confuse support for Palestinians as support for Hamas.

            • jabjoe@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s deliberate. If you don’t support Israel’s apartheid of Palestine, you are apparently antisemitic and want Israel destroyed.

              Hamas is not helping things. They are bunch of murderous religious nutters. They do want Israel gone. Just like how Israel’s nutters want Palestine gone.

              But Hamas are not Palestine anymore than Israel is its religious nutters.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I support the innocent Palestinian people who are being slaughtered. Does that mean I support Hamas? Because I think Hamas is an Iranian puppet that wants a Palestinian caliphate run under Sharia law. I don’t think they help the Palestinian people either. So am I a Hamas supporter? By your definition, apparently.

        • 0ryX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only issue I see are the dumbasses that cant tell the difference, supporting Palestinians doesn’t mean support for Hamas. But if you don’t think they need some sort of military support in one way or another you don’t need to be making comments about it and need to instead go back and read a little history about the Israelie Occupation and Crimes Against Humanity thats taken place. Hell you wouldn’t even have to go back in time very far but a year maybe less, but I suggest to get the full picture and decent understanding to allow yourself to come and discuss world topics with other adults that you start from the beginning.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only issue I see are the dumbasses that cant tell the difference, supporting Palestinians doesn’t mean support for Hamas.

            There’s a lot of dumbasses out there, which is sorta the issue.

    • TooManyGames@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to condone their actions, but what would Hamas care about getting supporters? Palestine situation hasn’t been helped much at all by international supporters, so it’s not like they care about that.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The two are linked together. When aid has been sent to Palestine, to help Palestinians, Hamas has taken it for themselves. There was an EU project I believe to build water infrastructure, and Hamas took it apart to make into rockets.

        I don’t think it’s possible to provide material support to the Palestinians. Hamas just takes it all. It’s so fucked.

      • mwguy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Palestine is dependent on foreign aid to continue its war fighting. Specifically aid from western nations. They need supporters to feed, fuel and supply it’s military and populace.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Might make people less happy to support pummeling them if they weren’t acting like such villains

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah why would they use civilians as human shields to gather the physical and online support of the easily misled and swayed masses of the west

      • guacupado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to condone their actions, but what would Hamas care about getting supporters?

        For one, all the Hamas supporters are asking the US to tell Israel to stop attacking them.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well I’ve done some maths, and I’m pretty sure the IDF can kill the population of Gaza faster than Hamas can kill the population of Israel.

    • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s exactly what Hamas wants to see because that’s what gets Israeli to lose international support and prompts Arab nations to invade.

      They don’t give a shit about the Palestinian people.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not lost them a lot of international support so far, I’ll be honest.

        While they may still be reeling from the loss of Bolivia, the people they do business with on a daily basis have picked their sides and stuck to it.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nobody is going to invade for humanitarian reasons. That only happens for very weak nations that have no international support.

        The government of Israel has amazing international support, first class weaponry, outclassing all of its neighbors militaries by orders of magnitude, and a ambiguous nuclear strike capability.

        They could literally take every one of their oppressed civilians, drop them into a vat of acid, live streaming on the internet indefinitely, and nobody’s going to invade.

        Give countries something to fight over, some material resource, and there will be a war, water, energy, access to trade, but humanitarian philosophies are things few people are willing to die for.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You said That’s exactly what Hamas wants to see because that’s what gets Israeli to lose international support and prompts Arab nations to invade.

            I had assumed your Arab nation invasion was due to the death of Palestinian civilians. In your scenario why are the Arab nations invading?

            • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because from their perspective someone invaded their land and is now vulnerable to getting kicked off it. The only reason Israel exists is because it’s supported by the US and Europe. Take away that support and Israel goes away.

              The intended result for Hamas is for Israel to respond with actions that erode the very support that they depend on for security against invasion from surrounding arab nations that don’t need any new reasons to attack Israel apart from the very existence of Israel in the first place.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Even if all external countries cut off military aid, Israel still is sitting on nuclear weapons. It’s unlikely anyone would try to invade them, they don’t want to get nuked.

                But in this scenario over the course of 5 to 10 years, they would be less able to power project beyond their borders. That’s true.

                But let’s not forget the The geographic neighbors, the military peers, are incredibly weak. So Israel becoming weak doesn’t really make their jobs any easier

  • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    A senior member of Hamas has hailed the systematic slaughter of civilians in Israel

    When asked whether this meant the complete annihilation of Israel, Hamas replied: “Yes, of course.”

    who still thinks hamas are the good guys?

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re coming to any international conflict, but specially to this one, from a “good guys/bad guys” framework you’re absolutely not helping.

      Sometimes (a lot of times, sadly) all you get in a particular issue is just assholes all the way down. Unsurprisingly, deadly military conflicts where both sides have proven at best a callous disregard for civilian casualties practically requires the asshole pile to be expansive and thorough.

      The question is how you get the endless, writhing mass of assholes to stop. Which isn’t looking great right now.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        More like they get accused of doing so even though their comment didn’t mention Hamas and they were talking about Palestinian rights, and somewhere someone pops up telling them they sympathize with Hamas.

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy users: why has Israel intentionally killed 3500+ children in such a short time?

        People that support/ignore genocide like Shardikprime: why do you support Hamas?

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nobody said they were.

      edit: okay crazy people on a lemmygrad site said they were. But that page that guy linked looked about as nice as a 4chan site…

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering I’ve been banned from World News at even suggesting reality in regards to how militaries fight in such conflicts…

        Yeah, even mods are ban happy regarding Israel/Palestine lol.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tactically their October 7 attack was incredibly silly, honestly what did they think would happen?

      They gave Netanyahu, who was finally fumbling at the reigns after almost thirty years aan excuse to execute his wet dreams and all of Israel uniting behind him.

      I see no way how they could have thought the attack would benefit their cause.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To answer the question, what they think would happen: Their October 7th attacked achieved everything they wanted.

        KSA and Israel we’re coming to an understanding and treaty, that was against the interests of Iran who is in a power struggle with the KSA.

        After their attack, it is now politically impossible for the KSA and Israel to have a treaty. That alone justifies this entire conflict from their power politics perspective

        They never had any hope of inflicting damage on the Israeli government. They clearly don’t care about their own civilian casualties. In fact The worst the reprisals the better for their recruitment and funding efforts.

        Probably not directly related to the rationale for their attack, but it got them some ancillary support, it removed Russia’s aggression from the news media cycle. Which probably got them some favor in those circles.

        From a media perspective, this has been a massive Boone for their campaign. They more or less had disappeared from international headlines for the last 10 years. Now everybody is talking about the genocide, and the ethnic cleansing. They’re going to pay very dearly for it, but that’s more media attention than they’ve had for a decade.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok yes I can follow that. The cynical thing is that in none of the reasons the Palestinian people are central. Those are victimized by both the Israelis and Hamas, following this rationale.

          An extra cynical level is that the wished of the extreme right Israelis and Hamas are the same. To keep this war going indefinitely, not matter the cost of human life.

          In what kind of setting would this be proposed? ‘listen we might invite genocidal terror on our own people, but Russia needs some radio silence and we crave media attention’ and everyone involved going like ‘that’s absolutely worth it brother’.

          Maybe I’m too naive, I cannot see the tactical gain in that perspective. Thanks though, for good counter points. It helps me trying to make some kind of sense of this.

            • Akasazh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah I know Machiavelli, I don’t remember suicidal tactics, though, and certainly not playing according to ones worst enemies playbook.

              But mass media wasn’t around in the Renaissance…

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The whole philosophy is how to get the outcomes you want, any means are justified.

                Saying person X is playing into person Ys playbook is making huge assumptions about their goals.

                We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

                • Akasazh@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

                  And I thank you for that exposition, however cynical it does give some reason to what appears madness.

                  But if it comes to serving the people of Palestine they aren’t really doing that, rather the opposite.

    • fer0n@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I made the mistake of commenting on this post where people clearly think that the Hamas are the good guys and have every right to do what they do. Apologies for linking to it.

      • TheDankHold@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course if you go to tankie central you get tankies. They’re also acting like Putin didn’t order the shelling and capture of Ukrainian cities and it’s all just (insert kremlin talking point here).

        They are a specific niche of political mind. The kind that only thinks western nations are capable of propaganda and evil. Don’t take them as representative of smarter people.

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bro even in the world news and the news instance they are all over Hamas. If they could, they would give him a BJ

        • fer0n@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I shouldn’t have commented. That post ended up in my hot/all feed and I didn’t really look at the community. I was frankly quite confused as to what’s up with these people until I saw the upvoted Russian propaganda comment which cleared things up quite a bit.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think one of my neighbors is a tankie, his car is really big.

          Edit: Found this, The Useful Idiots”: How Activists Spread Marxism Across America

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Who still thinks any state is the good guys? Hamas and Israel are both enemies of the people.

      The only way to cut through the propagandistic lies of these groups is to point out that neither truly represents the people they say they do.

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Difference is, Israel isn’t meant to represent palestinian people, Hamas is. And they are doing a great job of it, if their job is getting civilians killed.

        Edit: Just think about the massive protests against Netanyahu earlier in the year. Do those show how in tune the Israeli government and people are? No. But the very fact they could protest mostly peacefully differentiates Israel’s treatment of its population from all of its neighbours.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The… what? I have no idea what you’re even trying to say.

          The IDF is still dropping bombs on civilians. You can invent whatever bullshit you feel like, it doesn’t make that somehow okay.

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The IDF is dropping bombs on (suspected) Hamas holdouts, which are all conveniently located next to civilians.

              • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                It makes sense because it doesn’t violate Geneva conventions. If there are combatants hiding among civilians their deaths are 100% on said combatants. What do you expect Israel to do? After a terrorist attack that is equal to 17 (!) times the scope of 9/11 just to shrug it off and send more humanitarian aid to be pillaged by Hamas?

                • anteaters@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  100%. People here scream “genocide” and “war crimes” but have no idea what these words mean. The “friends” of Palestine here make even Reddit look normal.

              • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Doesn’t change the fact that in this conflict, the IDF are trying to get Hamas targets with their attacks. And that the Hamas are the ones that built their infrastructure next to civilians, that Hamas did kill Israeli civilians indiscriminately and that the Hamas knew full well, that by building their infrastructure next to civilians and by mindlessly raiding Israeli territory, the IDF would respond and kill palestinian civilians while doing so. Israel wants to crush Hamas. Hamas wants as many people to die as possible, so that Israel is made a pariah internationally.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Right… so it’s so predictable that the IDF would bomb civilians that any provocation makes the provoker guilty of their murders?

                  So basically the IDF are so irredeemable in your eyes they’re just a force of nature or something?

                  Again, you’re also ignoring the fact that Israel created Hamas.

                  And Israel SHOULD be a pariah. The only reason they’ve gotten away with this genocide for so long is because they’ve had unconditional US state backing.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Palestine territories are vassal states of Israel. Israel is ultimately responsible for the safety of civilians in the territory they control.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow, extremely wealthy country propped up by imperialism has a high happiness rating compared to extremely poor countries being stomped on by that same imperial war machine.

          Surely the poor countries are the problem.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Why not? Literally just give any explanation. You didn’t even try to explain in your first comment how “happiness” has anything to do with this.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I didn’t blame it on Israel, I said the imperial war machine. Israel the state is also the product of capitalist imperialism, but they are the beneficiary. I made that pretty clear I think.

                  The poor countries on that list are all the target of structural adjustment policies, which basically say “you need to neglect your population and become indentured servants, and if you don’t we will fucking glass your country.” That last part about glassing them isn’t in the text, but it’s clearly implied by the context these policies take place in. Also the leaders are usually bribed so they will agree more readily.

                  And just because Israeli citizens are “happy” according to some index that you’ve not actually shared, just insisted does exist, has nothing to do with whether the state is on their side. They are generally extremely wealthy people living in an extremely wealthy state that is propped up by US spending. The people who live there are expats from wealthy western countries, which is a privileged sample of a privileged sample.

                  I’ll refer you to Hank’s Razor: “Anything that can be explained by socioeconomic status in a society, it’s probably that rather than the thing that you’re measuring.”

                  This is almost certainly entirely socioeconomic status, directly influenced by geopolitics.

                  Also, Israel’s genocide is not making their people safer. It is endangering them enormously. The state just can’t stop genociding because it’s been given a green light by the US imperial war machine, and that’s just how states behave when they have that kind of power.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          And? You’re allowed to say what you mean, you know.

          Where do the civilians being bombed fall on your spectrum of evil? Do they somehow deserve it in your eyes?

          • rastilin@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, I have to ask. How would you apply this to any other conflict. For example the Allies fighting against Germany. Where did the German civilians fall in the spectrum of evil. Was fighting Germany justified, knowing that German civilians might suffer? If so, how is this situation different?

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Strategic bombing - ie, the indiscriminate bombing of populated areas - was ineffective and immoral, and people at the time condemned it as such, and they were right to do so. It was also wrong to use Japanese cities as testbeds for nuclear arms. There was no real strategic reason to do it.

              So like… don’t do that? Maybe Israel shouldn’t do that, because fucking obviously?

              Like yes, there were bad states on the allied side in WWII as well. You can see that in how they conducted themselves after the war was over, and at many points before that. In fact the policies of the Nazis were directly inspired by US genocides.

              You’re not going to trip me up by bringing up the Nazis. I said states are the enemy of the people, and I meant it.

              None of what I said should be construed as support for the fascist axis powers, that should just be obvious, but I’m sure I have to say it, because people are just going to try it on.

              • rastilin@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                But you’re still ok with using artillery against a city if the city has an army in it?

        • Limitless_screaming@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Attacking civilians to stop an apartheid from getting more money and support is evil.

          Making up reasons after you target civilians and journalists is another level of evil.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You must be reading a very different slice of the fediverse than I am. I’ve been blocking Nazis, tankies, and other assorted idiots on sight since I started using Lemmy, and I’ve seen maybe a handful of people saying things that could be interpreted as supporting Hamas. They are vastly outnumbered by people decrying the slaughter of civilians and apologists for Israel.

      • rastilin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        My impression is that at least half of fediverse.

        I got that impression too, and the fediverse has lost a lot of its shine recently. People are rushing to say that they support “both sides” and Israel can defend itself… but just not in any way that would be able to stop another attack like October’s from happening. It feels like a lot of people just want to side with Hamas, but don’t want to actually say that out loud.

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          They aren’t going about this in a way that stops this from happening is the problem. You’re so wrapped up in the Zionist narrative that they’ve tricked you into thinking extermination is the final solution.

          Britain didn’t get rid of the IRA by bombing and blockading Ireland. There was no ground invasion despite thousands dying in bombings and other violence.

          The fact is that the attack in October and others like it happen because the extreme Zionists like Likud have taken steps to ensure this. Because they’re creating a situation where they can be horrifically brutal but hide behind good pr narratives. They literally propped up Hamas at its inception with the stated goal of fracturing Fatah which was a moderate party suing for a two state solution.

          As long as Israel keeps killing Palestinians in the West Bank where there IS NO HAMAS, they will keep driving support for any group that resists Israel.

          You can get far more innocent civilians on your side if you treat them better than Hamas. Knowing everything we know about how Hamas treats them should tell you just how bad Israel treats them on top of that.

          You stop this by removing the war mongers from power first and foremost. As long as Netanyahu’s party has control there can never be peace. Because like Hamas, they want a one state solution too.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s been a very eye-opening experience over the past month to see just how little the left cares about victims of violence if they happen to be Jewish.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            As someone on the left, I can’t exactly disagree. When there’s violence against Jews, some people constantly bring up Israel. They respond to a story about antisemitism being on the rise by saying criticism of Israel isn’t antisemitism. And it’s ironic, because by saying that about antisemitic attacks, they’re the ones confusing the two.

            This needs to be pointed out to them more often. I don’t think most of them realize it.

            • probablyaCat@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nah. Don’t let the current situation fool you. You’ve seen that I’m very pro-Israel in my other comments. But there are many of us that are lefties through and through. I mean most Jews in the US lean slightly left of the democrats. I lean further. And David ben Gurion was super leftist. Hardcore socialist commie pinko, that one. If I had been around for the founding of Israel, I’d probably have been kicking back on a kibbutz somewhere.

              But the right is definitely not our friend. Most of them support Israel for christo-fascist dreams of the apocalypse. They want to use us. And we should be careful to think that we are the ones using them.

              I do not know where you are from, but especially concerning the US and Europe, I do think it’s important to understand where this support comes from – even if they don’t actually know it either. It’s the underdog problem. Israel is much stronger than in the past. We have won many wars against people who wished to murder us all. We became a force to be reckoned with. And the Palestinian territories are the underdog. And the left has normalized seeing the underdog as the marginalized victim. They are not used to seeing an underdog victimizer. From South Africa to Ireland to PoCs and the LGBT+ communities, they are used to things going one way. And things are not one way. There is a whole 3d plane of possibilities in this world. And that’s why I argue more about Israel than anything else on here. To try to help people see that things are not black and white. This isn’t a left or right issue. This isn’t a David vs Goliath issue. This is something that cannot be boiled down to simple concepts or comparisons. And the more you know, the harder it really is to if not agree with what Israel is doing, to at least understand why they might make the choices they do. And it is not for the sole purpose of ethnic cleansing or genocide. At least not for the majority.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To be fair, and I realize it’s difficult to be fair here:

      The Israeli government has said it is going for the total destruction of Hamas. Hamas has said it is going for the total destruction of the Israeli government… They’ve taken up equivalent positions

      I think what that really means, is both belligerents are going to try the radical new policy of killing more random civilians, and seeing if anything changes…

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas killed 1400 civilians.

      The IDF has killed about 9500 civilians so far.

      I dunno, I think that Hamas may not be the good guys, but they’re definitely the less bad guys.

      • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Give hamas same weaponry and intel as profoundly shit as IDF and israel might as well be one big crater

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, but they don’t. And they likely never will.

          Right now it’s like a 6yo child that punches you as hard as they can in the balls, and you respond by beating the fuck out of them with a tire iron. The fact that you could straight-up murder the child by shooting them in the fucking face doesn’t mean that breaking every bone in their hands along with both legs to “teach them a lesson” would be appropriate or proportionate.

          • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            For sure, but that wasn’t really my point, which was intentions and goals. Hamas is not a “good guy” since they will take every chance of murdering and kidnapping israeli citizens if it’s by high-precision missiles or fucking gliders straight out of a comic book, and israelis aren’t the “good guys” for barraging palestinian civvies while taking tiktoks.

            I feel vile for all this good guys bad guys rhetoric ffs gotta take a showa

            • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Israel did knowingly bomb a refugee camp. Twice. Kind of hard to defend that behavior as “self defense”.

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, I’m not saying that Hamas is good guys. They’re not. They’re terrorists.

              But by the scope and scale, by the amount of force that they’re able to bring to bear, and by the sheer number of non-combatants being killed, the IDF is far, far worse. Hamas targeted civilians on purpose, the IDF is simply indiscriminate.

              The Allied forces utilized the tactics of total-war during WWII, with things like the firebombing of Dresden, or Tokyo. The idea was to break the will of the people to fight. Well, spoiler: it doesn’t work. When you kill someone’s whole family, their friends, blow up their house and community, they end up having an even stronger desire to fight back. Just like the bombings of London by Germany increased the resolve of Britons, so did the indiscriminate massacre of civilians by the Allies increase the resolve of the Germans.

              The actions of the IDF are going to give Hamas it’s next generation of fighters, people willing to die to kill Israel.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hamas targeted civilians on purpose, the IDF is simply indiscriminate.

                I think the former is way worse. Besides, there’s no point in debating this. They’re both horrible. Agreed? Then let’s move on.

    • rastilin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, just to be clear, you’re saying that the attack against Israel was actually a secret Jewish conspiracy to make Hamas look bad?

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        More like a way to give Israel a casus belli to turn Gaza into a parking lot.

        Not saying that’s what happened, but as far as theofascist stayed go I wouldn’t be surprised

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t Netanyahu prop up Hamas? That’s all the info I need to know. That and one conversation with a Zionist, they are out of their mind and will straight up say that Palestinians don’t deserve to live. That conversation was over a decade ago and it still gives me the creepy crawlys… it was like talking to a proud Nazi that firmly believed in his ideology.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Zionists fall under the category of most religious extremeist- stupid and dangerous. If we could drop all zionists in a hunger games scenario with all members of hamas, maybe throw the Catholic Church in there too.

            Except nobody wins we just burn it down when they’re done killing each other like they’re going to do anyway.

        • Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. Repeatedly and constantly. It’s the rallying cry of the morons. Reality doesn’t fit my worldview so it’s reality that’s wrong!