• cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    4 months ago

    Honestly. I don’t give a fuck at this point. Just give me a D who can get to 270. Fuck the republican traitor filth.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s sort of the whole deal - we’re all looking for who can get us there the best (at least those of us arguing in good faith)

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      They Harris Trump wins she is a fucking horrible choice. Yall forget how many independents are sitting on the fence. Which means a lot of them still can’t choose (which should say a lot) No way she can beat Trump.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I still can’t fathom how the fuck anyone is an independent anymore. Too lazy to vote, yes. Have no idea who your party’s candidate is? Sure. Don’t know which party to vote for? No way in hell.

        • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Looking at voting data, almost no one is really independent. The vast majority of people who register independent almost always vote down party lines for one party, and they just don’t want to label themselves democrat or republican.

          • save_the_humans@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m registered independent. If we had options, I would have changed that to vote in the democratic primaries, and I considered changing it to vote uncommitted.

            Although I align more closely with progressive democrats, serious question, where do I fit if what I believe in most strongly is a Cooperative Economy and an alternative measure of GDP?

            For good measure for those interested:

            a sort of mathematical proof cooperation works better for, not only everyone but, the individual than competition and acting in one’s own self interest (aka capitalism).

            Economy for the Common Good (one alternative measure of GDP) explained. Starts around 7:00 minutes in.

            • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I am familiar with the concept of the cooperative economy

              You vote in local elections. You look for people with more progressive platforms and you put in the work to get them known. Even if they don’t necessarily want what you want, but their presence would move the overton window in your favor, you help them. I also work with people who want to scrap FPTP voting too. Even if we hard disagree on most issues, something like that is worth working together for. The US is very right wing, very corporatist, and very out of touch with anything not in their social bubble. This is going to take generations of work. Until then, if you are progressively aligned, you only, currently, have one real option at the federal level. Not voting for them doesn’t really hurt them, personally, but it will hurt a lot of people not in charge if the regressive party takes power.

              And who knows, might have to pick-up a rifle at some point.

          • greenskye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Which is why I don’t understand why the Democrats seem to so heavily target these mythical independents. Feels like the Republicans have completely stopped catering to anyone other than their base, meanwhile Democrats seem to ignore their base or compromise their own values for voters that don’t even exist. To me it’s the strongest argument for the whole theory of controlled opposition, even if I don’t really believe in that.

            • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              It is because our elections are not won by large margins. The difference between winning and losing is often decided less than 3% of the vote. While people who register for them, are basically locked in, with more nuance I am not getting into now, there still is about 3 percent of independent voters that do seem to vacillate between parties. With independent voters making up 42% of registered voters that amount can win, or lose, them the election.