Summary

Trump cut funding to Yale’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which was tracking Russian war crimes, including the abduction of 35,000 Ukrainian children.

A Yale source claims the U.S. State Department deleted key evidence, possibly hindering prosecution efforts and rescue missions. The data was crucial to the ICC’s case against Putin and others.

Trump, who recently met with Putin, has taken a pro-Russian stance.

Yale’s project had led to multiple indictments, but its shutdown raises concerns over legal and humanitarian consequences.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Remember when all the liars pretended to care about Palestinian children and yet somehow voted for Jill Stein or stayed at home? I do.

      • blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The 60 to 0 is so abrupt in the noise they made, I’m starting to wonder how significant a portion of that cohort was just bots and troll farms

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yeah I think many of them were not people with real opinions. Because that opinion was idiotic. Ignoring the consequences one claims to be avoiding takes a special kind of stupid

          • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            I think they were real people because I regularly get into arguments with those dumbasses. They also always have the same bullshit easily proven wrong logic.

            Fuck, two people today told me “Not voting isn’t inaction.” Like how fucking stupid do you have to be to think literally not doing anything is going to make something happen?

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        In swing States (where the election was decided), voter turnout was almost the same in 2024 as in the last presidential election. So you can stop repeating the debunked claim that voters who “stayed home” are to blame for Trump’s victory.

          • witten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Here’s the relevant quote from that link: “It’s true that overall turnout fell in much of the country, but in the battleground states that actually decided the presidential election, turnout was roughly where it was from four years ago. And it’s clear as day that a bunch of people changed their minds.”

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          That pokes a hole in their narratives they made up in their heads, so they won’t look at the data that proves them wrong.

          Amazing how they never blame Libertarians who on every ballot, but only those on the left of their favorite party.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    24 hours ago

    From the article …

    A Yale source said the US state department deleted the evidence which would have been used as part of rescue efforts to get the children home to Ukraine. It would also have been used to prosecute those behind their abductions – including Russian president Vladimir Putin.

    ”It is unclear whether it was by accident or intent, but it may reveal or it may cause potential criminal liability for the Trump administration, given international prohibitions against the destruction of war crimes evidence,” the Yale insider told The Independent.

  • NotLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This is absolutely fucked. Maybe the most explicit evidence of Russian interference, as I can’t think of any other reason for doing this.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    How does cutting funding end up deleting data? Unless they where hosting this stuff on fed systems they shouldn’t have been able to touch it, much less delete it.

    As for the ‘maybe it was accidental’, I’d laugh if it wasn’t so painful to reiterate what kind of sociopath we have running things.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Fucking orange Russian cunt muppet.

    Off with his head. Make Trump dead.

  • arakhis_@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    The Trump administration cut funding to Yale University’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which was compiling a database of alleged Russian war crimes, including the abduction of an estimated 35,000 children from occupied areas of Ukraine, last month.

    I mean the article is very tragic and all. But I cant help it to think the author’s sentence structure here is trying very hard to suggest the numbers were from last month. Am I the only one?

    • jpeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The information inside of the commas can be omitted, it’s just extra detail. The sentence can still read as ‘The Trump administration cut funding to Yale University’s Humanitarian Research Lab last month.’

      • arakhis_@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The extra detail couldve been placed on another more direct position of the sentence is what Im saying…

        “trying very hard” not “clearly stating the wrong”

      • arakhis_@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The extra detail couldve been placed on another more direct position of the sentence is what Im saying… “trying very hard” not “clearly stating the wrong”

        But thanks for being so helpful