• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            He persecuted socialists (basically the first people sent to concentration camps) and had capitalist policies? Any reason to suggest he was fond of Marx?

            But Mr (assumed) “proletarians_must_suffer” probably thinks that “socialism is when the state does stuff”.

            Go bother someone else in some ancap forum, where you belong.

            • proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              He persecuted socialists

              Are bolsheviks socialist? Bc they also persecuted socialists, communists, anarchists, etc, etc.

              and had capitalist policies

              He literally limited the profitability of companies to 6%.

              Any reason to suggest he was fond of Marx?

              He’s non-marxist socialist. Not all socialist are Marxists. Btw, fascists are Marxists. They’re what you call “revisionists”.

              Go bother someone else in some ancap forum, where you belong.

              I’m not an ancap.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Are bolsheviks socialist?

                No. They were state-capitalists.

                He literally limited the profitability of companies to 6%.

                You agree that companies made profits. That’s a capitalist policy.

                He’s non-marxist socialist. Not all socialist are Marxists.

                I didn’t say whether or not he was a Marxist. All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially. Even Bakunin agreed with Marx’s theory.

                Btw, fascists are Marxists.

                🤡

                I’m not an ancap.

                You’re enough of an ancap for me to care how you define yourself. You’ve proven enough how little of political/historical understanding you have.

                • proletarians_must_suffer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  No. They were state-capitalists.

                  Ok.

                  You agree that companies made profits. That’s a capitalist policy.

                  Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years. Not everything can be implemented immediately.

                  All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially

                  Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?

                  You’re enough of an ancap

                  What is that even supposed to mean?

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years.

                    Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere. You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing. And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour where juuuust about to be socialised. /s

                    Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?

                    Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?

                    What is that even supposed to mean?

                    You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview.