• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not every group is going to adapt and react the same way though. It’s not out of the realm of possibilities for the lord of the flies situation to happen, but what’s the rate. 10%? 1%? 50%?

    Partly the issue with N=1 statistics.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      True. It is plausible. At the same time I have to think that if the human race hasn’t evolved to factor cooperation in tribes in most cases, we wouldn’t be here discussing this.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Cooperation is beneficial to each individual’s survival when most in the population are cooperative. Pragmatic self-interest is beneficial to each individual’s survival when most in the population are selfish and pragmatic. I think most people tend to be cooperative, but there are plenty who will opportunistically fuck over cooperative people. The results would probably depend on the tendencies of the majority of the individuals in that situation.

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It depends entirely on how much established power the individual fucking over the others has.

          If it’s as ephemeral as holding a seashell, they’ll probably get their shit beat in. But if it’s far more established and hierarchical, yeah they’ll end up with more power over the others.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I kinda want the next one to a prison barge, just get the normal situation and and the massive outlier as the first two, just to mess with it for the next dozen until the pattern forms.

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Studies on the phenomenon called Elite Panic suggest that people in general are more cooperative in disastrous events than normally assumed by the elite, and often a lot of the rest of us too.

      • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Like, the elites would panic in a survival situation. But I have real survival skills that would allow me to survive until rescue. Someone like Bezos or Musk would starve quickly, or eat something poisonous without knowing whether it was safe or not.

        • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, Elite Panic is people in power or with money assuming that the rest of us plebs are going to go wild stealing their stuff and eating each other. They therefore believe they need to get a strong police or military force in place to control the situation, because we can’t be trusted. Many times in the past this happened it caused more issues and deaths as they don’t prioritize human life.

          Quoting from the wiki: Philip L. Fradkin detailed cases of “elite panic” during the Great Chicago Fire, the 1900 Galveston hurricane and the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.[10] After the San Francisco earthquake, Mayor Eugene Schmitz authorized the use of deadly force against “anyone engaged in looting”[11] – chiefly poor and working class victims of the earthquake. While residents of Chinese descent evacuated the disaster areas, and were segregated from white victims of the earthquake, Chinatown was itself looted by soldiers and members of the city’s upper classes.[12]

          Another: During the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, evidence of “elite panic” included the extensive media coverage of and political focus on reported looting and violence, the authorization of deadly force in response to reported property crime and the circulation of rumors about the behavior of New Orleans’ lower class and residents of color.[6] Mayor Ray Nagin appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show and claimed “hooligans [were] killing people, raping people” in the Louisiana Superdome.[7] President George W. Bush subsequently dispatched the United States Army to the city, where they prevented residents from leaving disaster areas.[16] On September 1, 2005, Governor Kathleen Blanco called off search and rescue efforts and diverted the attention of emergency services towards looting, warning that residents of New Orleans caught looting would be shot by veterans of the Iraq War.[12] Michael D. Brown, director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was later held responsible for the crisis, despite official guidelines stating that leadership during times of crisis fell to the United States Secretary of Homeland Security, who at the time was Michael Chertoff.[12]

          • Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            The Superdome thing is especially egregious, because a ton of people had worked to convert it into a refugee camp, including several armed patrols to make sure people didn’t steal shit they didn’t need.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Only like a third of them were even close to toddler age. Most of them were adolescents and early teens.