• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Neither TSMC nor Samsung ever produced chips in North America in the first place. And TSMC sells their entire production capacity (minus whatever they use for development), so I’m not sure how big of a draw the military production would be, especially considering there isn’t a pool of people who are ready and educated for chip production work just sitting around waiting for a job offer. Plus there’s a cultural difference in work/school ethics; people in North America aren’t as willing to dedicate their lives to work.

    • 5in1k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      people in North America aren’t as willing to dedicate their lives to work.

      Thank god for that.

    • quicksand@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Neither TSMC nor Samsung ever produced chips in North America in the first place

      I’m not sure what you mean by ever? Samsung’s been making chips in Austin for almost 30 years.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fair enough, my main point was that any chip fabrication capability added to North America isn’t moving it “back” here like it would be for many other industries.

        • quicksand@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ohh I misunderstood your other post.

          I agree with your main point. I don’t think international manufacturers would find value in spinning up new fabs here just to make chips for the DoD. But it does make me curious how big of a chunk defense is vs total. I would guess it’s pretty small. Chips are in everything, it’s not like these aerospace guys where DoD is their cash cow.