DEI
FYI: Diversity, equity and inclusion, not Department of Election Interference (which is currently staffed by Republicans anyway)
Like CRT, it’s one of their buzzwords for “bad thing” that I wouldn’t know otherwise.
cathode ray tubes?
TVs back in the day were woke!
If that’s the best they got they’re fucked
If the GQP cared about white women they wouldn’t have let their courts decimate Roe. Next ridiculous argument please.
Wooooow, him calling her unqualified is so cringe
Just compare their education and work
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Burchett
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris
He’s straight up only qualified to run fucking Tennessee, what an embarrassment for him to call anyone else unqualified
Sorry House Cons, did you say Hillary Clinton? It’s really hard to understand you with all that feces in your mouths.
Good. The more racist they get, the more likely they will lose. There are a lot of racist Americans, make no mistake, but even a lot of them get a bad taste in their mouth when the racism gets overt from politicians. They want laws that benefit them as white people, they don’t want to hear about how Biden is a friend to the N-s.
They are actually questioning Biden’s inherently racist decision to only consider black women for certain roles. The Republican position is that race should not be a factor in hiring decisions, and they’re using Biden’s VP and Supreme Court nominations to setup the counterpoint that he is the racist one - racist against whites.
inherently racist decision
Balancing the scales is not racism.
Let’s simplify this down to a coin flip.
Now for a long time, heads has been weighted to be the result for a while. So say the last 50 flips, it was 40 heads and 10 tails.
So you evaluated the coin and realize it’s imbalanced. Would you weigh the tails side so the next 50 flips show more tails so that over the 100 total flips, it’s balanced?
Or do you remove the imbalance completely, and can say the next 50 will be fair.
Statistics would say the later, but seems people feel the first option would make it “fair” even though it’s not balanced.
Equating “the attempted mitigation of generations of systemic oppression” with “coin flips” is both idiotic and deranged behavior.
You’re not being “logical”, you’re being flippant.
But, sure, let’s play in your space. Heads or tails. My coin is “fair”. Of course.
Heads, I kill something you like. Maybe friends, maybe family, maybe you like having all your fingers. It doesn’t matter; it’s all hypothetical.
Tails? Well, we just flip again.
Aaaaand, it’s Heads. Off goes the thumb.
Heads again, and I take the middle finger.
Heads, Heads, Heads! Might as well just take the whole arm while I’m at.
Oh, but alas! My coin was not fair; “unwittingly” balanced toward Heads. I’ll use a balanced coin now.
Yes, your arm is gone but it’ll be fair in the future.
Exactly! I’m glad you understand. And weren’t overly aggressive or anything.
Unless tails has the option to regrow said fingers or arm. You need to move forward with what is fair for everyone.
It’s pretty much impossible to balance anything after the fact. You need to have a forward thinking mentality for progress to be made.
Judging someone (or refusing to consider someone for a job) based on the color of their skin is racism. At least to most Americans. Which is why this is politically smart for the red team. The weird variation where you dismiss racism directed towards groups that were historically powerful is a fringe left idea, recently outlawed even in liberal California when affirmative action was banned.
No, only ever hiring white people is racism.
Hiring black people because white people are the ones who almost always get the job is redressing the balance.
I’m just talking about the way most Americans define it. You don’t have to agree, but from a political science perspective, you’re playing a losing game if you stick to that definition. The majority of Californians don’t even agree with it, so imagine how much worse it polls in the rest of the country…
Do you have evidence to show that the majority of Californians think that Harris was a “DEI hire?”
Now you’re twisting my words. I’m not trying to defend Republicans. I’m trying to help you understand the nature and intent behind their words so you realize they aren’t as dumb as you think. Respect thy enemy and all that.
Most Californians think hiring based on race is wrong, and racist. Across the country, the margins on that get even better.
Republicans are just playing into that. You can downvote me all you want, but it doesn’t change the political reality of the situation.
Edit: I just checked - 7 in 10 Americans oppose affirmative action (reverse racism). To quote Biden, “It’s a fact, Jack!” You may support it, but that doesn’t make it a winning campaign strategy.
That would also be racism. Any time you use race as a hiring factor in the US, you are breaking the law and promoting racism.
You really don’t understand the concept of racism.
Racism: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group.
Putting my PoliSci cap on… Most Americans would say, “Two wrongs don’t make a right. Being racist today isn’t a valid fix for the harms of people being racist yesterday.” And that’s why Republicans win when Democrats focus too much on racial issues - the 7 in 10 perceive it as a new form of racism directed at them.
Do you want to be right at all costs? Or do you want to win this election?
The Republican position is that race should not be a factor in hiring decisions
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! The party of cronyism and nepotism, the least diverse political party? Really?
They had their white representation for about ever and now have a chance to have their WOMEN representation.
/ not from the US.
What about them? One ran in 2016, remember?
What about the E-males!
What about buttery males?
It’s only a little bit of collisional with the DNC to fuck over Bernie.
It was her turn.
Not just collisional, but liability and comprehensive too.
Hey, anyone remember those old peanut butter cup ads? The ones where some peanut butter and chocolate get mixed together accidentally and people realize they taste good together?
This is just like those ads! Except with misogyny and racism, of course.
And the mix tastes like shit.
I made this joke 12 hours ago:
I want to create an account on whatever social media they’re on and agree with them loudly and adding “What are they planning on doing for the white man?” or something similar to every statement.
The Democrats aren’t about regular people anymore! What are they planning on doing for the white man?!?
Except I’m pretty sure a whole shit pile of them would agree with me and nominate me for something or other. Then I’d just be sad.
I guess it was less a joke and more prophetic.
Your (current) logical fallacy is… Whataboutism!
What about white females? The right would still call them derogatory names if they didn’t completely and wholeheartedly submit to them.
What happened to white women? Well, she ran for office and you claimed she was unfit for office because women are emotionally unstable and something about emails that magically disappeared as soon as Ivanka got caught ACTUALLY deleting emails.
If I said some clown ass shit like this while representing my employer I’d get dropped so hard. Would love to see this turd face some consequences - other than having to live inside his own head anyway
Would the GOP like to have a white woman as a candidate as an alternative? No? Then STFU.
(I know, they’d probably give us Majorly Tugid Greens or something, but still.)
