• mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Everyone lamenting this needs to check out neocities, or even get into publishing your own website. Even if it’s on a “big evil” service like GoDaddy or AWS, whatever. As long as it’s easy for you. Or learn to self host a site. The internet infrastructure itself is the same, but now we have faster speeds, which means your personal sites can be bigger and less optimized (easier for novices and amateurs to create). People still run webrings, people still have affiliate buttons, there’s other ways to find things than search engines, and there’s other search engines than the big ones anyways.

    There are active communities out there that are keeping a lot of the old Internet alive, while also pushing it forward in new ways. A lot of neocities sites are very progressive. If you have an itch for discussion, then publish pages on your website in response to other people’s writings, link them, sign their guestbook.

    Email still exists. I have a personal protonmail that I use only for actually writing back and forth to people, I don’t sign up for services with it aside from fediverse ones. People do still run phpbb style forums, too. You’ll find some if you poke around the small web enough.

    A lot of these things are not lost or dead. They just aren’t the default Internet experience, they’re hard to find by accident. But they are out there! And it’s very inspiring and comforting.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Its not that there is a shortage of these spaces, its that they are not popular. I’m not sure they ever were popular amongst the general public though, to be fair. Personally I think its okay to have a somewhat small community.

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes, I like it smaller! Ideally you have a sort of fractal structure of a bunch of smaller, tighter communities, which are also bound up in larger but looser communities. Then you can get the benefits of broad exposure and resource sharing from large communities, as well as the benefits of meaningful individual engagement and respectful kinship from smaller communities. I think that personal sites along with forums and the rest of the Internet really can do a great job of bringing this about.

        As with many things, the responsibility ultimately lies on the individual to protect themselves and resist falling into bad patterns. Most primarily, maintaining your small community takes effort, and it’s much easier to just be a passive part of a very large community that subsists on infrequent uninvested involvement from many people. It’s even easier to be part of a “community as a service” like Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok, etc. where all the incentives behind community building responsibilities have been supplemented with real income or fame. But of course then the people making posts, suggesting ideas, steering trends, managing communities, etc. are all in it for reasons that are not necessarily aligned with the well-being of community members. Hence the platform becomes a facade of a healthy community. Really good community upkeep seems to need to be done out of a love for the community, and any income you collect is to support that, rather than the other way around. But love for a community is often not sufficient fuel to power someone to serve huge groups out of the goodness of their heart, when they don’t even know 99% of the members. Not to mention that even if someone really is that altruistic and empathetic, the time and resources become unfeasible. So ultimately, a fractal model or an interleaved model seems to be the only one that could work.

        Don’t get me wrong. Large communities are awesome in their own ways and have their own benefits. They have more challenges, though. Ultimately the best way to build a good large community is by building a good small community.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Would you say all of that is true for communities outside in the real world? Ive a theory that groups can become so large the negatives nearly always outweigh the positives but I haven’t really had time to think it through entirely.

          • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 minutes ago

            I do think the real world has some differences that make it more difficult. Mostly that whoever is coordinating the larger groups is very likely to have access to more power and resources and therefore is corruptible. And then that’s one of the systems that brings about that Pareto distribution sort of imbalance among people. Some inequality in terms of power is not destructive, but too much is almost guaranteed to end badly. But online, the sort of power and resources that are accrued are ultimately just less likely to eventually reach a point of being able to exert full control over the smaller layers of the community. I mean sure, someone could start acting despotic with their own “fiefdom” as another commenter aptly put it, like has sometimes happened with open source repositories or forums, but it’s hard for someone’s website to get so popular that they’re somehow able to directly force changes upon your website (not impossible, I know).

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I always look back to the 1960s visionaries and their charmingly naive ideas about the future use of computers.

    I suspect that if they could have seen the actual future they would have become plumbers.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    On the early days of the internet, I found a website about a comic I like. I emailed the person who made the website. I told them that I liked the site, and I sent them a game that I’d made (which had nothing whatsoever to do with the comic or their site). They tried the game and said it was fun…

    That kind of interaction can never happen any more. Money has ruined it. Scams and monetization, everywhere, making everything into manipulative toxic sludge.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do people never mention anything other than YouTube? DailyMotion is trash now but was around then. Veoh was another good one. There were so many other video streaming platforms before YouTube’s reign. Some forums still exists. Before Spotify, there was several music streaming platforms also and I’m not talking about LimeWire. playlist.com was legit before and GrooveShark was the Spotify before they decided to kill it off because couldn’t profit. So many cool things before capitalism ruined them (e.g. Skype).

    • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ads are fine relatively speaking. Its the data brokers that are the real problem

      • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Data brokers wouldn’t exist without ads. The whole reason companies collect info on people is to better manipulate them into buying products.

  • ZMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Pardon me, but Friendster was for friends - Myspace was for tricking people into listening to Nickelback.

  • RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Internet was even better before 2001. Around 2002 is when paywalls started becoming a thing along with the increased enforcement of the DMCA.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I remember when I first got access to the internet in the 90s and it was mostly forums and whatnot run by hobbyists. Finding stuff was a bit tricky, but Yahoo was largely usable to find stuff. Wikipedia didn’t exist, but encyclopedia brittanica or whatever was a thing and worked somewhat okay online. Pictures bigger than a thumbnail loaded like a slideshow on dialup, but text was responsive, and text-based online games were becoming more and more common.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a bit more nuanced. Trolling and ragebait absolutely was a thing, but there was still a certain sense that it was just part of the Wild West nature of the internet. Someone posting racist garbage on a phpBB would be a minor irritant that would catch a bit of flak but be otherwise ignored.

    These days it’s entire office blocks full of professional trolls armed with advanced analytics, profiling systems and AI paid to push political agendas. And the most frustrating part of it is that despite the fact that everyone knows this to be true, it’s still working anyway and we have elected officials of ostensibly Developed countries repeating obvious bullshit they saw online.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trolls actually saw themselves as an art from. Everyone else saw them as annoying cretins.

      I agree with your comment.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      People had thicker skins too and IRC’s /ignore was used.
      People now whimper over anything and can’t seem to know how to block others.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think those old forums dedicated to discussions and interests are still there. The internet has been urbanized and now most people live in large cities, but some people still live in small towns in the countryside.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      they would sell to you the rope to hang them.

      They would sell you a subscription for the rope nowadays.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Britain ruined North America (ask the many natives of colonial times) before America could ruin the rest of the continent, then itself

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m not sure I’d pin the ruining of north America on the Brits. They got that ball rolling.

          • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            While the big three empirical powers that colonized the Americas are all at fault, they are late comers compared to the Spanish. By the time the British started their first colony Desoto had ripped through appalachia, on a quest for gold, and had murdered, raped, and enslaved many natives. More importantly though, he introduced most of the tribes to old world diseases, which was apocalyptic to them.

            • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              True, that ball was already rolling when the Brits kicked it, but my point is that it didn’t stop being kicked afterwards either. Or to this day, really.

              • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 days ago

                Oh yeah, the Native American genocide is still happening. These days it is mostly ignoring treaties to take their land for things like oil pipelines, but still going on.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      They would sell you the rope to hang yourself … and market you the idea that it would be a good and popular thing to hang yourself with their Deluxe Hangman 3000 Super rope made from naturally sourced hemp.

      • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think the expression is the capitalists will sell you the rope with which you’ll hang them.

        So long as you’re planning to hang them next quarter – they can’t see that far.

    • DontMakeMoreBabies@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      Stop blaming capitalism - people are the problem, not the systems they create.

      The average person is a fucking retard and that’s not changing - when they reach a space, it goes to shit.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        This self-loathing bullshit is way too common.

        People aren’t the problem, the average person is average, the system is what drives down the average mental and emotional intelligence instead of up, and humanity is filled with plenty of people like Mr. Rogers, Bob Ross, and Harriet Tubman.

        “People” are okay. They’re just suffering under the boots of a small group of people who are not.

      • sneaky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        As long as we’re blaming something instead of coming up with a new system of distributing goods and services.

      • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think a problem is that different people have different meanings attached to the word capitalism

        when some people hear it they think of trillionares exploiting homeless people, but when I hear it I think of private property and markets and competition

        Im chill with the 2ed meaning, as long as it doesnt get out of control (like nowadays)

    • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      3 days ago

      Listen, I hate capitalism as much as the next guy, but that’s not the case. Normies ruined the internet, then capitalists latched onto the normies.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The normies are fine, the problem is that capitalists consolidated everything into 4 websites and then started pushing the unprofitable weirdos like us off those sites.

        It’s not a big deal, we’ve made niches for ourselves and will continue to do so because we can’t rely on corporate services not to enshittify.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s not a big deal

          It’s absolutely a big deal. Normies getting propagandized by capitalists are how we got fascism, and no amount of “making niches for ourselves” will save us from that.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Plus the corporate web constantly kills off our niche spaces in the effort to make them palatable for advertisers by sanitizing minorities out of their own spaces.

            I used to be super active in r/traaaa before the 3rd party plugin exodus and subsequent shutdown of the forum. Now? Those people either made a new Reddit or scattered to the 4 winds, and a similar space has struggled to take off here on Lemmy. And that’s just one of many instances of this sort of thing happening.

        • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Both are rights, but the normies definitely destroyed the internet culture. They invaded forums without any regard for the rules set before (remember “RTFM”?), and when capitalism arrived, they all moved to commercial sites.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Normies ruined the internet

        I’m sorry, I can’t hear you over the Cyptocurrency freaks, the click bait video game ads, and the endless AI generated slop.

        What was this about my dear sweet mother, who can barely check her email anymore because of all this crap, ruining the Internet?