• Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    We need a landslide for Kamala - Enough to scare at least a few republican SC members out of giving the win to the GoP out of fear of lynching when a bunch of states inevitably refuse to certify results

    Then we need to be prepared for an actual attack on the government and pissed off Trumpers killing citizens

    Can’t assume anything but worst case and prepare for it as the GoP is in full Hitler’s Nazi Party mode

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m not sure you understand what a revolution is. It doesn’t involve attempting to work within the existing failed system to try to change the system.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And after that, we need a revolution. Everyone appointed by Trump will be given the option of resigning office or being relocated to Gitmo. This has not been politics as normal. This has been an attempt to resurrect the late 19th-century spoils system.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Can’t assume anything but worst case and prepare for it

      Stock up for a couple months worth of supplies and food. Ensure you have some alternative ways to heat and cook food. Have some self defense strategies/supplies. It is a good idea to prepare for an emergency anyway. Worst case scenario, you are prepared for a natural disaster or power outage or a strike.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      23 hours ago

      We need a landslide for Kamala

      Agreed. Kamala had the start of that during/ before the campaign. Like actually great performance. Since/ during the campaign, she’s shifted to the right, focusing mostly on how “good she is for business” and touting Republican endorsements. She refused to engage with the uncommitted movement. Before the convention, her trajectory had her heading into the 50-55% zone by election day. That stalled out with her rightwing shift. She’s on track to lose this election.

      • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You don’t deserve these down votes.

        • Hillary lost despite winning the popular vote by a +2% spread
        • Biden won with a 4.5% spread in the popular vote
        • Obama won by 7% and reelected by ~4%

        It’s not just that Democrats need to win big to shut the other side up, they need to win big just to overcome their inherent disadvantage in the electoral college.

        With Kamala sitting around 2.2% nationally on average, being within the margin of error of the states she needs to win, and her momentum seemingly stalled for the reasons you listed, Democrats should be worried.

        As someone who would vote for her, or just about anyone who is not Donald Trump, I hate this.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Lemmy reacted the same with regards to addressing the reality around Biden’s chances of winning and his obvious failings at being able to turn things around. Moderation have cultivated a toxic culture of radical rejection of any kind of criticism of Democrats. There were bans about it.

          However, this condition is not unique to Lemmy. Its symptomatic across corporate/ cable news as well. The inability to accurately and faithfully address your own teams performance is absolutely hampering the left/ Democrats ability to be successful in this election. We need to be more critical of the people supposed to represent us because we need them to be actually capable of winning the election. The stakes are too high to leave entire sections of the actually registered Democratic electorate for Harris to be chasing Republicans (when that strategy has been demonstrated to fail for almost 30 years.

          We need Harris to do better, not just because its the moral and right thing to do, but because we abso-fucking-lutely can not afford to lose this election. Don’t hide a candidates weaknesses, bring them up and force them to address them. Force them to become a stronger, more electable candidate. I mean jesus fucking christ, your opponent is a felon and rapist. Harris can’t do better than a 2% spread on DJT? Do fucking better Harris. Stop chasing the fucking Cheney war criminal families endorsement and go apologize to the uncommitted crowd.

      • zigmus64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        How do you say she’s in track to lose. All the data I’ve seen makes me optimistic.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Safety for Democrats is leading in national polling by +10. Kamala isn’t +5. She needs +5 to be break even due to structural issues like the electoral college and voter suppression. Her trajectory prior to, and through the convention supported her getting into the safety range. I think that because of what we’ve seen from the supreme court, this needs to be a blow out. We know republicans will be doing everything they can to steal/ cause chaos and confusion around results/ fail to certify etc. If it isn’t violently clear from a major victory, this thing goes to Trump.

          Its delusional to think that Kamala is on track for that kind of major victory, but as with Biden’s performance and likelyhood of winning, self-delusion around their favorite teams ability to actually win seems to be Lemmy’s kink.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            538, which goes by electoral votes, has here winning 55 times out of 100. It’s not an overwhelming win for sure and still not much better than a coin toss…but also not “on pace to lose the election.”

            • Icalasari@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Remember that the GoP is gunning to not certify election results so it goes to a Republican controlled SC that has been shown to be corrupt

              I don’t know what the threshold needs to be for the SC to behave, but it needs to be hit, whatever it is

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              538 is meaninglessly bad after Silvers exit. I get that you don’t get it, but if Kamala doesn’t “win by a landslide”, which would be 55% plus in the national aggregate and winning basically all of WI/MI/MN/PA and at least one of AZ/NC/GA by numbers which do not warrant a recount, Republicans win.

              They key that you need to understand is that break even, is actually losing badly for Democrats. The deck is literally stacked against them. And its going to be worse this time. Republicans realize that all they need to do is, if it comes down to one state, get that to the supreme court and they win. The Democratic path to victory has to be effectively uncontested/ insurmountable. Anything less and its Bush v Gore all over again.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  I am 100 not saying the polls are wrong. However 538 completely changed when Nate Silver left. They are a shell of their former self and their models are a joke. No one should be taking them seriously. The weights and polls 538 was including in it’s aggregate has Biden to win when he was polling at 37%.

                  If you want good polllingnirnmodelinf silver bullets, nates personal project is far superior.

                  I am 💯 a polls nerd and check my posts for some analysis I’ve done.

                  Go back to the data on 2020. Biden under performed his polling across the board. He was leading and did win, but not nearly the the margins he should have.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                20 hours ago

                and at least one of AZ/NC/GA by numbers which do not warrant a recount

                That’s the thing: there are no numbers which do not warrant a recount here in Georgia anymore. The MAGA elections board has passed rules that force them to do hand counts (which they can easily fudge to be slightly off), then use that manufactured discrepancy as an excuse to refuse to certify. Even if there are a fucking million more votes for Harris, ratfucking it so that one hand count comes out 1,000,001 and another comes out 1,000,000 will cause them to say “welp, something went wrong and the vote is invalid” and send fucking Trump electors anyway.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  So write off GA. Harris has to win Either NC or AZ to make it such that TWO state level results would have to be forced to the SC. Whichever Sunbelt state +1.

                  It’s hard. “Doing ok” isn’t fucking good enough and the apologists willing to make excuses for Democrats at every turn are the very reason Democrats struggle so hard to do anything legislatively or electorally.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                As I said, it’s not much better than a coin toss. And what you just linked to has trump winning 35% of the time. If you say it is going to go one way 35% of the time and it never goes that way, your models are bad because it should have been 0%.

                Also, polls were historically accurate in 2022.