Summary

Vivek Ramaswamy, recently appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has proposed defunding federal programs that lack current congressional authorization.

This could affect programs like veterans’ healthcare, NASA, and early education initiatives, which still receive funding despite expired authorizations.

Ramaswamy argues that cutting these programs could save billions, and he’s committed to targeting expenditures that “don’t advance the interests of American citizens.”

DOGE, co-led by Elon Musk, aims to curb government spending, with Musk estimating potential cuts of up to $2 trillion.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Elon musk being like “all that money we’re spending on vets could be going into my pockets.”

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Do it. Cut tricare too. I don’t want those things gone, but holy hell yes please eliminate the willingness of the military to aid you against the constitution. Defund barrack improvements and force married troops to bring their spouses into the barracks while you’re at it.

    Crash and burn and let us rebuild America with an understanding it wasn’t immigrants or trans people that did this, it was rich people and fascists.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This will piss off every single veteran, active service member, and their relatives. I don’t just want this shit to fail, I want people to remember just how little fucks these people give about anyone other than themselves.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I want to see these fucks do this then ask for the military to keep them in office when they violate the constitution

    • el_bhm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      If you hear back well they did not realize… you answer with yes, this is how little they care

  • molave@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Optics of cutting the programs aside, it’s criminal that beneficial programs like these don’t get re-authorized.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Shameless, veterans risk their lives for their country, the least the govt can do is give them healthcare

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Unfortunately for veterans, they aren’t risking their lives for their country. They’re risking their lives for the special interests of corporate oligarchs who couldn’t care less about them.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I know but that’s a hard sell for poor young recruits, if they knew this more they’d charge like mercenaries

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It was authorized, but it had an expiration date. Now it’s something that we just take for granted so much we never even thought about having to re-authorize it.

  • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    This is amazing. Good. Fuck the troops. Let’s see you garrison your military bases in every other country in the world, losers. You can’t even meet recruiting goals now!

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Any woman or veteran or union worker who voted for Trump is going to have a serious case of buyers remorse. I am none of those things but still voted for Harris because it seemed like the responsible thing to do, lesser of two evils. Way lesser it seems.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    FWIW, this breaks from the Two Santas Strategy. This Santa is suppose to be funding things conservatives want, while at the same time reducing taxes (on the rich), thereby driving the deficit up without making their voters mad. If you actually cut funding for a bunch of stuff people rely on, you will earn the ire of the voters, that’s why no one ever does it.

    Yeah, there will be a core of people who will defend Trump and Musk to their self-inflicted death, but those people are in the minority. Most Americans (and most people in the world) voted against the incumbent this year because they were unfortunately there during a time of inevitable inflation. And they’ll do it again if their lives continue to get materially worse over the next few years.

    I can’t help but wonder how we would be sitting right now if Trump had won in 2020. But we’re due for a generational crisis, and I don’t think that wouldn’t have been nearly as exciting.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Remember when if you didn’t “support our troops,” Republicans would ask you why you hated America?

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The good old days when it was republicans who were “if you’re not with us I will enjoy watching you die”

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      At best, “support our troops” was a version of that dumbass magical thinking that, in earlier times, held that the U.S. lost in Vietnam because Americans didn’t clap for Tinkerbell, err, I mean, support the war. Mostly, it was a thought-terminating cliché.

      Yeah, as you rightly point out, it was never about the soldiers themselves.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        “Lost in Vietnam”? Oh, no, they were saying much worse than that. It used to be that if you suggested the US lost Vietnam that you were “insulting the bravery of the troops” or some shit like that. It was only after the War on Terror became unpopular that you could say the US lost Vietnam (because, you know, it did) without some jackass wingnut bringing out the faux patriotism.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I learned the ugly truth of that way back in 1990 when I was still in Middle School and Bush Sr. sent Americans to die for oil in Iraq and all of his fans in my town were tying yellow ribbons around the trees in their yard to “support the troops” being sent to die pointlessly.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “This bloated liberal socialist program is inefficient and doesn’t work. Because it’s liberal and socialist. So we’re going to get rid of it. We’re planing to plan a replacement plan, but we haven’t planned on when to plan it. But we’ll blame the libs for that too, even though we have essentially captured all branches of the government at this point.”

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They’ve learned their lesson from 4 years of failure to repeal and replace Obamacare. “Replacing was hard and expensive and anything that addresses people’s concerns or doesn’t ensure failure to re-elect was to the left of this, so we’ve decided to just repeal and not replace. Get over it loser.”

    • NutWrench@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      "And Goober Nation will believe it when we say that ‘the libs’ are responsible. Despite the fact that we control the presidency, the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court and the news media, because they have the collective memory of a goddamn goldfish. "

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Part of me, as an outsider looking in with abject horror, wants to see this happen just because I still hold out hope that it might finally wake up a not-insignificant part of rural and rust-belt America that live off these benefits (or ‘handouts’ according to the GOP) out of their political stupor.

    But on the other hand, I know that once it’s gone, it’s very unlikely to be brought back in the immediate future by the current crop of Dems, who seemingly would rather keep dangling it as a carrot (along with restoring ablation access) in order to entice voter turnout.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If it’s gone it’s gone. Those people in rural America who live off handouts and vote R can live with the long term consequences. The only way you will see a change is if they are no longer insulated from the consequences of their actions. Fox News Propaganda is going to be spinning itself in circles to justify why their “gubment program” was ended under Trump.

      Perhaps they will vote blue in the future and we will have enough of a majority that more liberal policies can be enacted.