• Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Reminds me of the leftist venezuelan regime monthly rations in the form of cajas clap.

    Absolutely disgusting food.

    Thank goodness I was able to escape the dictatorship with my family

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is what Conservatives around the world want and glory hallelujah we are almost there! The only difference is all those rations will not come from the government but from corporations paid for by the government.

    • 4 boxes Kraft Mac and Cheese
    • 6 cans Heinz Beans
    • Etc.
  • Jikiya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That’s not enough butter. I would have been put down young for rioting about criminally low amounts of butter.

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Hey, I’m Polish and I do sometimes smile. I am living in Denmark, dough.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      average smoker smokes about 20 cigarettes a day. so it’s a little less than half of a monthly use of cigarettes.

      from what i understand the ration was meant to supplement what you consume, not provide everything

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      For a month? It’s just dried shredded leaves wrapped in paper, cigarettes are super cheap to produce, tax makes them expensive.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You didn’t live in the eighties I bet. It was cheap back then and everyone smoked.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Can someone calculate the calories in that? I’m too lazy.

    Maybe don’t include the sugar. That’s a shit ton of sugar to go through in month.

    • asqapro@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Ballpark estimate, excluding the sugar:

      2.5kg beef: ~6265 Calories

      0.5l vodka: ~1082 Calories

      1.3kg white rice: ~4743 Calories

      1.3kg flour: ~4732 Calories

      500g butter: ~3585 Calories

      300g cooking oil (Google says rapeseed oil is popular in Poland so I used that): ~2652 Calories

      250g chocolate: ~1338 Calories

      Total: 24,397 Calories or ~813 Calories per day

      Some other people online also did the math and came up with similar numbers. For example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37027027 came up with 33,063 Calories (including the sugar)

      • kralk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You get another 333 calories from the sugar, add it to the vodka!

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Nice, that was super fast. I guess it’s probably enough for one person to survive if they practically don’t move at all the entire month, for a little while at least.

        Still not pleasant I imagine.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          What would you be willing to do to ensure that your fellow citizens aren’t dying of literal hunger on the streets?

          (Clearly to most Americans, that answer is “absolutely nothing”)

  • EvilHaitianEatingYourCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Unpopular opinion: we need to ration electricity consumption as well as fuel today, even in capitalists countries. Because that stuff actually has incredible impact on the planet, and will (must) drive consumption down, so that companies / individuals start integrating “efficiency” into their thinking

    I don’t see any other solution to the “exponentially growing power consumption” problem.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Pigouvian taxes are a traditional solution to negative externalities, and they are often better received by the public than rationing.

      • It’s expensive to be poor - the lights turning off a few days before the end of the month will incur even more costs than a higher electricity bill.

      • Taxes raise money for other programs, instead of costing money to enforce rationing.

      • Higher taxes in general will also help reduce inflation.

      • Tax revenue can be spent on stimulus checks to offset the cost for people who use less energy than average.

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I don’t see any other solution to the “exponentially growing power consumption” problem.

      In the U.S., at least, power generation has been roughly flat for the last 20 years, not growing exponentially:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_of_the_United_States#/media/File:Timeline_of_U.S._electricity_generation_by_major_energy_source.png

  • Kvoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’m not gonna say that’s anywhere near sufficient, but as a US citizen where do I sign up

    • PixellatedDave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well if you really want to be restricted purchasing the maximum amount of those items then you don’t need to sign up. Just limit your monthly amount to be as displayed.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      To be ration-limited by what you can purchase? I’m sure that’s a fad diet somewhere.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I might bring tankies out of the woodwork for saying this, but I remember one time a tankie told me that scarcity in communist countries is by design and it’s a good thing, after I pointed out that people had to be on the waiting list just to get a car. What if the person lives in rural with no access to public transport?

        I understand capitalism is wasteful, but doing the extreme opposite and making people wait to own a car or giving someone bare essentials is not a good thing. Having a scarcity economy is not good, especially considering that the Soviet Union produced more tanks than cars throughout its history. The American military industrial complex is rightly criticised for overspending, but communist countries are worse since the case is that more tanks were made than civilian cars. It means more budget went to the military than to producing consumer good. Talk about priorities.

        • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Soviet Union had a limited ability to produce things, especially heavy machinery. Their leadership quickly realised that they can’t outproduce the Western countries on everything, so they decided to only match their military production capabilities. Which led to them falling further and further behind.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Not a tankie, nor a communist, just a progressive with an interest in history, but,

          after I pointed out that people had to be on the waiting list just to get a car. What if the person lives in rural with no access to public transport?

          Is such a US-centric view. They all didn’t need to drive cars, dude, they had public transportation.

          Edit: Added emphasis for people having trouble reading

          • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yes, busses were relatively common and affordable, but many of them were smelly and horrible. Except for the Icaruses, the passengers of which felt like kings among men.

              • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                No but the person you replied to called out a specific scenario in which the person lives in a rural area with no public transport access which is a real thing in every single country, with good public transit or not.

                The concept of someone not having access to public transit isn’t an American centric point of view.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Not all countries have good public transport system. Imagine living in Siberia at the time of the communists, unless you’re in gulag which doesn’t require you to travel to other places.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          No, are you sure? /s

          Don’t take what tankied say like they mean it, it’s just propaganda / they amuse themselves coming up with lies that you have to unravel and defeat. And if you do so, then magically the discussion is over and we’ll talk about some other thing.