• Mickey7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    If we have a minimum age to run for President then why not a maximum age. Initially we didn’t need it because most people would be dead by 70. But we need it now

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        People can also be mature before 35.

        The idea is that in a country of 320 million, there should be enough qualified people, and nobody cares if you disqualify some people who should still be okay.

        There is also the aspect of very old people not having to live with the consequences of their decisions.

          • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            The US has a bad history regarding competency tests. It’s better to have a cut off age.

            Even if they’re mentally capable, they probably won’t be alive to experience the consequences of the decisions they make while in office.

            Plus, in your 90s you’re not going to be very aware about the issues that most of the population face.

  • ininewcrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    By age alone, he’s already acquired 10% of the vote in whatever election he joins … get him to commit a felony and he’ll gain another 5% … some sort of sexual misconduct 5% … say he’s Christian (even if he’s not) another 5%

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Didn’t Frodo offer it to Tom Bombadil, who actually touched it, but refused the offer? I know everyone else wouldn’t/couldn’t even touch the thing.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Tom Bombadil is a spirit-divine-thing from from ages long before Middle Earth. And yes, the One Ring likely didn’t even recognize Tom as a person so much as some natural element. To Tom it was as useful as a common ring forged of tin.

        Tom is the most special of the special cases, and I remember someone (Gandalf?) suggesting he could easily walk the ring to Mount Doom if he had a mind to, but would likely forget what he was doing a hundred paces later.

        But for sake of this thread, the One Ring is a solid allegory for power, specifically money or political power. This trend of boomers staying in office until they are infirm and senile (and clearly no longer capable of actually serving) shows just how tightly and desperately we hold onto power.